Mr. Romney: Instructions On How To Save America

Free Republic Original Content | October 25, 2012 | By Laz A. Mataz

[LucianOfSamasota]

Good post!

[Responsibility2nd]

As usual Laz, you offer a ton of common sense proposals. I read them all. But I'll comment (first) on #1.

FIRST, ROLL BACK THE OBAMA TIDE.

1. Carpet-bomb all executive orders issued since Jan 20, 2009. Every last one. Do not even read them, which would waste too much time. Obama's directives have, to a fault, been harmful to America and her interests.

 

Here is where I'm afraid Romney/Ryan will drop the ball. VP to be Ryan has already said their administration WILL NOT seek to overturn the repeal of DADT.

One of the greatest FUBO's to ever infest our military and the R/R ticket will let it stand?

~sigh~

[LucianOfSamasota]

Address the issue of the news media abuse and propagandizing. While the Pravda Press has been consistently biased throughout American history, it is only since 2008 that they have been actively campaigning for a given candidate. Clear and unequivocal lies by the Democrat have been ignored, while fake 'scandals' or 'gaffes' by the Republican are front-page news through several cycles. It is time to address this problem, but to be honest, I'm not sure how you would do that. Market forces will certainly ease the situation, and lawsuits might convince those who prevaricate or distort facts on the airwaves and in print -- by omission OR commission -- might be a viable approach.

I have a suggestion for this one: Since the US self identifies as 40% conservative and 70 - 80% Christian, and polls indicate that those in the mainstream press poll as 5% conservative and 7% Christian, why not file a lawsuit alleging discriminatory hiring practices based upon religious preference? Surely it is impossible to undersample Christianity by an order of magnitude UNLESS such preference disqualifies the applicant?

The lib's have been terrorizing legitimate business with these discrimination lawsuits for years, with notable success. Why not turn their own tactics against them?

My guess is that 50% Christians in the msm would greatly curtail the anti-American and anti-traditional values bias that seems to be inherent in today's Godless media

[RMDupree]

I'm impressed! :-)

I would change this..

Assure Business that Obamacare is a transitory threat. Announce to the business world that great care will be taken by this administration to minimize the impact of Obamacare. Start by vigorously challenging each item line by line, in court and by Executive Order, and when possible putting a court-mandated Stay Order on the item in question, until such time as the item can be removed legislatively.

...to simply abolishing the damn thing.

[stephenjohnbanker]

Better than good!

This required a great deal of thought beforehand, and it shows!

[Vendome]

+1

[humblegunner]

Start scaling back the giveaways.

[Lazamataz]

The Official Lazamataz Sometimes-Funny, Sometimes-Disturbing Ping List
153 Satisfied Customers!™

[thackney]

BTTT

[Lazamataz]

I definitely worked the hell outta this one. :)

[Norm Lenhart]

Each of these is important in its own way. But No.2 is the big one. The infrastructure of govt will kill any effort for reform until that infrastructure is gutted. Every advisor, runner, secretary and dog walker must be replaced.

One of the biggest mistakes Bush made was allowing Clinton holdovers. To hell with the MSM screaming. Get rid of the ALL.

Or be ready for sabotage at every turn from loyalists.

[ottbmare]

As far as MISCELLANEOUS #2: you can’t change that one. Obama and his buddies are going to need nearly three months to shred all the evidence!

[Lazamataz]

Thanks! I have a ping list if you want more like this...

< /shameless self-promotion>

[Lazamataz]

I feel items 1, 2, and 3 on ROLL BACK THE OBAMA TIDE are all equally crucial. That is why they are situated at the very top. :)

Thanks for your kind assessment of the work! :)

[SamuraiScot]

VP to be Ryan has already said their administration WILL NOT seek to overturn the repeal of DADT.

Don't be confused. If Ryan said that, it was a safe thing to say, because the repeal of DADT was a lame-duck Congressional action, not an EO. So it's the new Congress's job to undo that repeal. If Mitt doesn't want to fight that fight right out of the gate, he can let the resulting bill pass without his signature.

[Lazamataz]

I'm impressed! :-)

Told ya being on the ping-list wouldn't half-suck. :)

[stephenjohnbanker]

” The Official Lazamataz Sometimes-Funny, Sometimes-Disturbing Ping List
153 Satisfied Customers!™ “

154, if you will add me : )

[Lazamataz]

As far as MISCELLANEOUS #2: you can’t change that one. Obama and his buddies are going to need nearly three months to shred all the evidence!

As far as I am concerned, that's a great argument FOR doing it. :)

[Norm Lenhart]

It’s a good work ;) All of it. And much needed. I hope someone in Romney’s camp is listening and takes it all to heart.

All things aside though, I think 2 is the biggie solely because without it, all the rest will be hosed.