We need to name this something that gets folks attention.
I would suggest slaughter-gate.
That’s how the Dems get the media’s attention. Why not play this one by their rules.
We failed to protect them. They were slaughtered.
Obama couldn’t be bothered to save them, but he claims he’ll fix it. Having a president to attends his national security briefings would tend to do that. Since he has proven he won’t, we’ll get someone who will.
Adios oBambi.
"Relatively transparent" compared to Baghdad Bob? To Goebbels? I suppose you could argue that Obama eventually admitted he was at least a little wrong.
The article continues, He justified his contention, in the question he cued up guest panelist Van Jones: “We learned over the weekend that even the talking points that Ambassador Rice received on that Sunday morning from the CIA suggested there was no pre-planning.”
Maybe her notes suggested that, but Obama was selling the demonstration/video story with might and main.