Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Son House

To expect the Libyan police to protect a US Ambassador is idiotic. You don’t expect the British police to protect our Ambassadors and underlines their foolishness you would leave an American there as a target. It was a death sentence.


109 posted on 10/21/2012 7:06:51 AM PDT by bray (Islam- A billion medieval savages can't be wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: bray

Well that just goes back to the judgement of the Obama Administration to open an Embassy there in the first place. They didn’t have a clue about what they were getting into. Just like microeconomics, they ignore the facts and pretend as if they know-it-all and have the answers.


128 posted on 10/21/2012 7:20:09 AM PDT by Son House (The Economic Boom Heard Around The World => TEA Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

To: bray
To expect the Libyan police to protect a US Ambassador is idiotic.

Not idiotic at all. The host country is responsible for protecting diplomatic missions. We do it in the US. The Bureau of Diplomatic Security is responsible for assisting foreign embassies and consulates in the United States with the security for their missions and personnel.

If we don't have host country assistance to provide security assistance, then there is no way we can defend our embassies. The issue with Libya was that there was no real government in place, especially in a place like Benghazi, to provide that assistance. We should not place our people in such places period.

The purpose of US furnished armed protection for diplomatic facilities abroad is to buy enough time so the host country can come to our assistance.

131 posted on 10/21/2012 7:22:14 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson