Posted on 10/20/2012 5:35:42 PM PDT by tapatio
The White House on Saturday denied a report in the New York Times that said the Obama administration had agreed to one-on-one talks with Iran on its nuclear program.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
Thinking about Iran’s intransigence vis a vis Israel, I’m wondering if Obama agreed to one on one talks on the destruction of Israel.
Hussein will bomb them and say, “we can’t change horses mid-race”...
There is no such thing as a B-3 Bomber.
There was much talk that this was going to be another October Surprise.
I wonder if maybe Romney derailed it by warning the Iranian government that he would NOT be pleased with Iran if they accepted Obama’s invitation but Obama lost the election anyway.
?
Let’s see if this is brought up by Schieffer on Monday night so that Obama can say that he can’t discuss anything now, but he’s always working hard on a diplomatic solution.
What talks? Obama gives Iran 5 nukes, on condition that the first is dropped on Israel?
Maybe they decided to go with Gloria Alldead’s October Surprise instead????
Catherine Herridge on Fox just said the timing, just two days before a debate on foreign policy is questionable.
I smell a RAT, and Romney should "proceed" with extreme caution. I smell another SET UP.
Fairly safe to say WH would not want anything done anywhere until after the election. They can just make up stories then about what they are “accomplishing” instead of having those pesky WH-caused problems cropping up.
duh.
I think the whole thing including the denial was staged .
We’ll find out Monday night if Schieffer brings it up. If he does, then it was intentionally put out there to make Obama look presidential and voters might be forfeiting a major breakthrough with Iran if they don’t vote Obama
Thanks tapatio.
Dick Morris predicts an Obama-Iran ‘October surprise’
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2947895/posts
U.S. Officials Say Iran Has Agreed to Nuclear Talks
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2947862/posts
It’s a quote from the movie, WAG THE DOG.
If you’ve never seen the movie, YOU SHOULD.
(If you haven’t, I can point you to it)
Notice that multiple sources in the media are ‘printing’ this story. It’s not coming from the dark corners of the web, but straight from the Corporate World of Media.
When you want someone to believe something, the way (in politics) is to get out and DENY, DENY, DENY.
The game, in this case, is that Obama’s campaign staff are trying to tell the public, “reelect us, and the day after, we bring home our soldiers/achieve world-peace/stop the bomb”.
The only reason this ‘story’ is getting SO MUCH news attention, is BECAUSE the WH wanted it out there.
They HAD to do this because plan “A” (the one where Obama promises to rescue Ambassador Stephens/recover the 20,000 manpads weapons/etc) somehow went to hell.
She opened the political conversation on this call, without prompting she says:
"My God in just the 2 mile stretch between town and our condo, there are only 2 Obama signs. There were about 40 Romney signs."
So I guess in that stretch of not-wealthy-nor-poor (i.e. middle class) territory, the polling has Romney up by a hard 91%. Then, assuming the non-sign people will break to the challenger, I think we can call it 97% to 3% along that stretch.
Sorry - wrong thread ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.