1 posted on
10/20/2012 1:07:16 PM PDT by
Kaslin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: Kaslin
Not in cahoots? So why did she cut off the Fast and Furious discussion right on queue?
2 posted on
10/20/2012 1:10:12 PM PDT by
The Sons of Liberty
("Get that evil, foreign, muslim, usurping, gay commie bastard out of MY White House!" FUBO!)
To: Kaslin
Oh, I see!
And that must have caused her to interrupt Mitt every time he tried to make a statement.
There are some people in this world who simply have no shame..........and a lot of them seem to be in the media.
3 posted on
10/20/2012 1:10:20 PM PDT by
basil
(Second Amendment Sisters.org)
To: Kaslin
So how is this not "in cahoots" with Obama?
4 posted on
10/20/2012 1:10:52 PM PDT by
x
To: Kaslin
I wonder if Candy Crowley and John Candy were related.
6 posted on
10/20/2012 1:12:38 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(This is America! Being dead is no excuse not to vote!!!)
To: Kaslin
Candy Crowley Not in Cahoots With Obama; He and Axelrod Used Her If she's too stupid to realize she's being a puppet, why does anyone think she's smart enough to report the 'news'.
7 posted on
10/20/2012 1:13:26 PM PDT by
MamaTexan
(I am a Person as Created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
To: Kaslin
Right I believe that. I always carry papers given to me weeks before with me at all times...like her’s from 9/30 . She had the transcript right at hand. Good thing she keeps it with her.
8 posted on
10/20/2012 1:14:03 PM PDT by
nclaurel
To: Kaslin
9 posted on
10/20/2012 1:16:32 PM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
To: Kaslin
Candy just WANTS to be used. It’s a dirty business, I’m sure she feels the same.
10 posted on
10/20/2012 1:16:50 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: Kaslin
Thanks for posting.
This account is an outrageous rewrite of what really happened!
If any reasonable, logical person views the 5+-minute video of the President's Rose Garden statement, listens to the inflections, and uses ordinary common sense, he/she will come away with the conclusion that he was not calling the Benghazi attack a "act of terror."
Crowley either did not do that, or she was complicit in promoting a lie.
Remember when the President once claimed that "words matter"? Crowley asserted on The View that it was "a semantic thing." No, Crowley, it was not a "semantic thing." It was a "truth thing."
To: Kaslin
The alternative explanation offered is not better....
Candy Crowley was STILL a plant.
In several different senses of the word.
13 posted on
10/20/2012 1:17:35 PM PDT by
alloysteel
("If you are going to follow the road less traveled, at least consult your GPS first.".)
To: Kaslin
As long as no one has a video clip of Candy Crowley saying, “Hi everyone! It’s great to be here! I’m thrilled to be in Cahoots, Iowa with the president on this momentous day!” So long as there is no such explicit statement from Candy, I guess no one can says she is in Cahoots.
14 posted on
10/20/2012 1:18:06 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Global Warming is a religion, and I don't want to be taxed to pay for a faith that is not mine.)
To: Kaslin
She may not have been buying what Axelrod was selling, but she was more than accommodating when Obama yelled ‘get the transcript.’
She became part of the debate, rather than being an impartial moderator.
15 posted on
10/20/2012 1:19:20 PM PDT by
TomGuy
(Dukakis is to tank as Obama is to binder & Big Bird)
To: Kaslin
OK, I get it. She's subconsciously in cahoots with 0bama.
All better now.
16 posted on
10/20/2012 1:21:30 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
To: Kaslin
They just can’t admit they used a fat chick.
17 posted on
10/20/2012 1:21:39 PM PDT by
bmwcyle
(Corollary - Electing the same person over and over and expecting a different outcome is insanity)
To: Kaslin
Not in cahoots? When have any of the MSM not been 100% in the tank for Dear Leader? They've been worshiping at the shrine of Obamination since he was a candidate for POTUS. Nothing has changed; they are all in for hum. Bammy is their creation and their idol.
To: Kaslin
She should sing a song from the fifties.
Will you still love me tomorrow?
Her having a copy of the transcript shows it was a set-up.
To: Kaslin
As usual, our side “wins” afterwards when the deed is done and the sheeple are no longer paying attention. D’uh!
21 posted on
10/20/2012 1:26:27 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
To: Kaslin
I guess they are still talking about this fat bitch and her obvious attempt to help the Fraud in the debate.
To: Kaslin
‘I am not evil, I am just stupid!’ One sorry arse defense for the indefensible.
23 posted on
10/20/2012 1:28:04 PM PDT by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: Kaslin
Cahoots, conspiracy, collusion! Why can’t you people see that it’s none of that, that it’s what even a liberal I spoke to last night admitted - a conspiracy of minds, and that is much, much worse!
24 posted on
10/20/2012 1:29:18 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson