Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeminoleCounty
"Thanks for the info on the longbow....so it was around much earlier than what the “Conventional Wisdom” states?"

It seems to have been around, in one form or another, for a very long time. I think the reason that so many people associate the longbow exclusively with England is because that country made a very conscious and determined effort to make it an important (vital) part of their military. For hundreds of years, people in every village were required to train with the longbow.

The French could have done the very same thing - they certainly had a first-hand understanding of how effective the longbow could be, they had yew and they had many examples of English longbows, but they chose not to. The French were more concerned with maintaining their established order, rather than have well-trained, well-armed peasants upsetting things.

68 posted on 10/20/2012 7:45:27 AM PDT by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Flag_This
France during the period in question was actually several distinct states with their own languages, traditions, recently dispossessed nobility, and, to a degree not often appreciated, different religions (although everybody found it worthwhile to make it look like your standard issue Catholics were in charge).

The top drawer folks in France had no interest in arming former Burgundians, or Bretons, or Gascons, or Italians, or Swiss, or..... GERMANS! Eventually they had to, but the English nailed them when they were weak ~

72 posted on 10/20/2012 10:03:26 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson