Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Flag_This
France during the period in question was actually several distinct states with their own languages, traditions, recently dispossessed nobility, and, to a degree not often appreciated, different religions (although everybody found it worthwhile to make it look like your standard issue Catholics were in charge).

The top drawer folks in France had no interest in arming former Burgundians, or Bretons, or Gascons, or Italians, or Swiss, or..... GERMANS! Eventually they had to, but the English nailed them when they were weak ~

72 posted on 10/20/2012 10:03:26 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
"France during the period in question was actually several distinct states with their own languages, traditions, recently dispossessed nobility..."

That's a very good point. Britain faced a very similar situation, in that the Brits were trying to incorporate into one army Irish, Welsh, Scots, Saxons, Normans and people from Brittany, Gascony and other portions of what ultimately became France, but which had been under English control since Eleanor of Aquitaine and Henry II had been married. The author of the book I mentioned earlier stated that Edward III, or maybe it was Henry V, had a greater claim to the French throne by birth than did the French claimant at that time. Ultimately, the diversity of Great Britain became its strength (sorry, I just had to go there) as these diverse peoples were unified in their hatred of all things French.

74 posted on 10/20/2012 10:36:38 AM PDT by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson