they have played the libs brilliantly
I have no real argument with either statement. But Romney could have advanced the ball much, much further with a neutral moderator.
Just think how badly Obama would have looked had a neutral moderator pressed him on the nonsense he was spouting.
The optimist in me says that we’re getting a two-fer.
1. 0bama is going down in November.
2. The media are being exposed for the lying, biased weasels that they are.
Romney had him on the canvas on Libya and Crowley rang the bell early. But he has to think about this until next round and worry about how he will respond. But EVERYBODY knows he was lying.
R is going to pummel him over and over about this and Fast and Furious. His poll numbers are going to plummet after that.
I’m of the opinion that this was better for the country than if there had been a neutral moderator. Romney was able to demonstrate he has the mettle to not only BE President, but also to take on the liberal and biased media by taking them to task. The country was able to watch this unfold, where, with a neutral moderator that would not be the case. Obozo being held accountable by a moderator would have, I believe, given the left ammunition they should not have been provided. This way Obozo was disarmed and effectively.