Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jdsteel
B.S. It is sexual drive, not the drive to reproduce.

You do realize that these are both terms for the exact same thing?

Only liberal morons think they are separate and that you can have your cake and eat it too. As a liberal myth, it's right up there with taxing the 1% to support the 99%.

31 posted on 10/18/2012 11:32:29 AM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Valpal1

They ARE NOT the same thing.

Whether you can grasp it or not, men do have sex without wanting to impregnate someone.

So procreating IS NOT the driving factor.

You’re lost in space here.

Some idiot professor made a comment, and you fell for it hook line and sinker. WRONG!!!!


33 posted on 10/18/2012 12:10:37 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (We should ignore the absurd peripheral, and focus on the absurd Obama. People died. He lied!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Valpal1; Mr. Jeeves
You are both quite wrong. There is a distinct difference in the desire to have sex and the desire to have a child, and societal forces have noting to do with the difference. If you were right maternity wards would be filled with men ogling newborns in the same numbers that go to strip clubs. Sexual acts that do not include the possibility of reproduction would not be desired. There would be no fetishes. There would be no homosexual sex.

This article starts with a premise and then wastes a lot of words trying to justify that premise, even though it is false. Reminds me of the Communist Manifesto, just shorter.

48 posted on 10/19/2012 4:55:54 AM PDT by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson