Posted on 10/15/2012 10:09:04 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Time for your daily reminder that State didnt merely stick Chris Stevens with average security despite him living and working in one of the jihadi-est places on earth. The security they provided him was actively, inexplicably, inexcusably bad. And before you read any further, let me remind you that the ominous chat-room message posted by Sean Smith the day he died about a Libyan guard taking photos of the compound still hasnt been addressed by anyone in the government that Ive seen. Did Stevenss security break down to the point that his killers actually had someone on the inside?
More red flags from Reuters:
State Department officials suspected that two Libyan guards hired by its own security contractor were behind an April incident in which a homemade bomb was hurled over the wall of the special mission in Benghazi, according to official emails obtained by Reuters
The April attack illustrated concerns among some U.S. officials in Libya that hiring local residents for embassy guard duties could in itself raise security issues.
The emails identified one of the suspects in that incident as a former employee of Blue Mountain Group who had been fired four days earlier for vandalism, and said the other was still working for the company. Both were unarmed guards who performed routine security tasks, such as screening visitors.
Both suspects were ultimately released after being interrogated by the local police, a.k.a. the February 17 Martyrs Brigade, which was partly responsible for providing security for the consulate and whose members were last seen hiding on the roof during the attack because they werent ready for it. No word on whether either of them was still working for Blue Mountain on 9/11, but that brings us to another unanswered question. Why did State hire Blue Mountain, an inexperienced firm, in the first place?
Other firms in the security industry expressed surprise that Blue Mountain had won a large, high profile contract from the US government. One industry executive said the level of service Blue Mountain provided did not appear adequate to the risks presented by a lawless city.
We have visited the consulate in Benghazi a number of times and have an excellent relationship with the Americans. Our assessment was the unarmed Libyan guards were extremely poor calibre, said one security source. The Libyan Ministry of Interior are generally not happy with Blue Mountain and had them on their close observation/target list.
The New York Times last week reported that major security firms with a track record of guarding US premises elsewhere had made approaches to undertake work in Libya but were rebuffed.
We went in to make a pitch, and nothing happened, a security firm official told the newspaper.
Blue Mountain had six employees on the scene, five Libyans and one British supervisor recruited from the celebrity bodyguard circuit. Security was sufficiently weak that BMs local affiliate, Blue Mountain Libya, complained to its parent company this past summer that the resources they were being given werent enough. State was asked to intervene in the dispute between the two but chose to do nothing. So it came to be that the U.S. ambassador ended up on 9/11 at a consulate that was vulnerable even according to its own security detail, and which State had had ample opportunity to fortify. Meanwhile, on the same day, the U.S. embassy in Barbados enjoyed protection from a detail of Marines. Smart power, 2012.
Just as Os interest in an easy intervention in Libya made a difficult intervention in Syria more difficult, States decision to half-ass security for the Benghazi consulate has created a new, bigger security headache for the White House in Libya. Namely, how hard do they hit the local jihadis in reprisal? The Libyan government doesnt want to approve an attack lest it be seen as a U.S. stooge at a moment when its trying to build legitimacy, and the U.S. doesnt want to raise the profile of a group like Ansar al-Sharia by making it the Great Satans new enemy number one. There is a compromise solution, but of course its not ready yet. If only State had thought of this before letting a smile be Chris Stevens umbrella against the mujahedeen.
See what Lame Cherry has to say -- pretty scathing.
Nice work there Bon mots.
I am guessing you have not been thru the long thread from Sat night discussing Col Hunt’s interview ....see if I can find it.
Col. Hunt on the Newest Libyan Revelations (huge coverup!)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2944272/posts
see Post #14:
For six hours the entire military, intelligence, diplomatic and civil command structure of the United States government watched, in real time, as our consulate in Benghazi was under attack, while our ambassador and his hobbled security died.
That command structure did nothing. Afterward, they lied outright to cover-up their own culpability for political reasons. An intelligence failure, under the circumstances, was impossible.
This thread has links to Benghazi threads for cross reference:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2944345/posts
Oh yes, I had heard Col. Hunt’s interview on the Carr show on Sunday I think it was.
You know I’m reallt at a loss at this point as to what to do.
If congress refuses to perform its function and impeach and convict this criminal president, then I am ready for the marines to go in and get him out of there.
This man is dangerous. I would not be surprised at all if he purposely starts wwIII on purpose in thenext couple of months.
Any ideas?
Nice Work!
As far as I know, it only came up on Rush’s show yesterday via a well informed caller.
He mentioned the interview and described exactly this.
Rush’s only theory was that such systems must not have been enabled yet since the embassy was relatively new. the man said not according to Col. Hunt.
Rush responded that if that is true, then, paraphrasing here, there is nothing good in this at all.
This is why I thought that Rudy Gulianni saying that this embassy had been attacked twice previously dispells any possibility that security system were not activated, they knew this location was a target.
Why isn’t this being openly dicucssed? Because our traitor president his having his ass covered again by the media, by our congress, by our intelligence agencies, everyone.
Ernest, I think we have a dangerous, dangerous man in the white house, and I think that it is very possible that we are going to pay a high price for this folly.
Thanks...very much.
What Happened In Benghazi( Shot across the Bow from State)
From Powerline blog.
***********************************EXCERPT*****************************************
Posted on Sun 14 Oct 2012 06:21:27 PDT by RummyChick
The State Department has released a transcript of a briefing that two high-ranking department officials gave to a number of reporters via conference call on October 9 (Tuesday). I am not certain about this, but I believe the transcript was only made public today. You should read it in its entirety; it is the most detailed description I have seen of the events in Benghazi on September 11.
It's an international incident of the highest order. Even the administration characterizes it as the worst attack of its kind in over 30 years. That's one thing I will agree with them on.
Thanks, The Disaster is dead meat.
The ambassador never made it to the “annex.” He died of smoke inhalation at the main consulate building FWIW. I don’t know what all his business was but he had a regular day of seeing foreign diplomats on Sept. 11th. The last one was a Turkish diplomat who left about 20-30 minutes before the shooting started.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.