Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blueunicorn6
Their actions in promoting the Arab spring in Libya “gave” the terrorists these weapons.

Yes, that's what I said. They won't be held to account for that though. They already got away with their little un-Constitutional "kinetic action." No one uttered a peep about it. McCain was all for it. It was "bi-partisan" ya know.

82 posted on 10/14/2012 1:27:54 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

First, I don’t disagree with you. I’ve spent the last couple of days fighting with people here on FR that I don’t really want to fight with.
The big point is the coverup. They want everyone to think they’re covering up because they were incompetent and didn’t have enough security at Benghazi. That’s not it. They withdrew the security to show good faith in dealing with the terrorists who have, or at least claim they have, the missing missiles. Not providing adequate security can be viewed as poor judgement. Withdrawing security to try and cut a deal with terrorists makes them look incredibly naive and stupid. I mean stupid to the point of having to leave their positions. They knew the terrorists were coming. The deal was set up. THEY GOT PLAYED. THEY ARE SUCKERS. That’s why we have the coverup. And that means the end of the Democrat party.


84 posted on 10/14/2012 1:51:12 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson