Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: COUNTrecount

She may be able to distance herself from the White House’s video excuse but she cannot distance herself from ignoring the repeated requests for increased security at the Consulate before the attack. It’s her State Department that decided to spend money on Chevy Volts in Vienna instead of reliable security in Libya.


3 posted on 10/14/2012 11:13:36 AM PDT by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ops33

Hillary cannot distance herself from the video claim. She made a video shown in Pakistan blaming the movie. She also used it at that horrible event when the bodies were returned to the US.

Mrs Clinton went along with the scam and it is too late for her to pretend she was not a part of the whole scheme.

The blame lays with everyone in the Obama chain of command, including Barack Hussein Obama.


10 posted on 10/14/2012 11:23:01 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ops33
It’s her State Department that decided to spend money on Chevy Volts in Vienna instead of reliable security in Libya.

Actually the money (over $100K) was spent on a charging station for the embassy's Volts, not for Volts themselves. That story was posted on FR within the past few days.

40 posted on 10/14/2012 11:55:58 AM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ops33; Ann Archy

Thank you! You see that this fiction began with Hillary Clinton and was picked up by Obama and only last passed off to Susan Rice. Obama went back to bed after hearing what a nothing burger this attack was suppose to be. Where did that come from?

This may indicate that the fiction was put in place before he was even informed. Maybe not, but it’s possible, so, I look at Valerie Jarrett and wonder what she knew, when did she know it and what did she do with the information?


55 posted on 10/14/2012 12:24:51 PM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CHRISTO REY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ops33

That will be very difficult with this video out there:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqoPnAg3BAE


99 posted on 10/14/2012 2:54:12 PM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ops33

Meaning Hillary was ‘in’ on the hostage exchange (blind sheik for ambassador) from the beginning. Low security in high tension area? There’s a reason to ignore protocol when there’s a plan in place. (Did Obama really think a hostage exchange would benefit his reelection?)


120 posted on 10/14/2012 6:56:11 PM PDT by griswold3 (Big Government does not tolerate rivals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ops33

Yes, well at least the embassy in Barbados had good security.


124 posted on 10/14/2012 7:05:14 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ops33

Yeh, I don’t see how this helps her any! Horrible.


128 posted on 10/14/2012 7:11:40 PM PDT by madameguinot (Our Father's God to Thee, Author of Liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ops33

Hillary stood in front of 4 coffins and talked about the video. How can she distance herself from that?


154 posted on 10/14/2012 8:33:22 PM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson