Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC journalist: Biden not pro-abortion enough
Life Site News ^ | October 12, 2012 | BEN JOHNSON

Posted on 10/12/2012 12:55:56 PM PDT by NYer

WASHINGTON, D.C., October 12, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) – Although the Obama administration is frequently described as “the most pro-abortion administration in history,” Vice President Joe Biden’s views are not pro-abortion enough for some in the media.

On the eve of last night’s vice presidential debate, ABC “freelance journalist” Sarah Parnass posted an article calling Biden “an imperfect messenger for supporters of abortion rights.”

Biden, she wrote, “has not been unwavering throughout his career in support of the right to choose.”

Although as a U.S. Senator Biden “voted to establish fines and penalties for barring access to abortion clinics, he repeatedly voted to ban so-called ‘partial-birth abortions.’”

Parnass added that Biden and then-Senator Barack Obama had voted to outlaw transporting a minor across state lines to have an abortion “in order to get around parental consent laws.”

The article noted the vice president’s self-declared “personal” opposition to abortion, noting that Biden will “take his cues from the Roman Catholic church on this question.” 

In the debate, Biden said he accepts the “de fide doctrine” that life begins at conception in his “personal life,” but added that he refuses “to impose it on equally devout Christians, and Muslims and and Jews.”

Biden has long clashed with his Church’s leadership that abortion represents a violation of natural law that should not be condoned by law, saying such views are “inappropriate in a pluralistic society.” 

In his 2007 book Promises to Keep, Biden wrote that he opposes “federal funding” of abortion and has voted against it. However, the Obama administration has reversed the Mexico City policy that prohibited such funding going to abortion organizations overseas, while abortion will also be funded under various provisions of Obama’s health care reform law.

By contrast, Parnass classified Republican Paul Ryan’s views as “unmistakably far to the right on the issue of abortion.” During the debate, Ryan said he believes life begins at conception, and “the policy of a Romney administration will be to oppose abortion with the exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the mother.” 

Parnass notes on her website that she has “reported on national news from education policy to national security as a Global News Intern at The Associated Press,” the world’s largest and most influential news service.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; biden; media

1 posted on 10/12/2012 12:56:03 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; thefrankbaum; Tax-chick; GregB; saradippity; Berlin_Freeper; Litany; SumProVita; ...
The article noted the vice president’s self-declared “personal” opposition to abortion, noting that Biden will “take his cues from the Roman Catholic church on this question.”

Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list

 

2 posted on 10/12/2012 12:57:07 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Ya know what? FINE, CHOOSE ALL YOU WANT!!!!!!!!!! Just don’t make me pay for it.


3 posted on 10/12/2012 1:12:37 PM PDT by VaRepublican (I would propagate taglines but I don't know how. But bloggers do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I have looked at the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and even the Articles of Confederation, and I did not see Abortion listed as a “Right in any of them”, of course I didn’t see free health care, or obozo phones in their either.


4 posted on 10/12/2012 1:42:03 PM PDT by verga (Forced to remove tag line by administrator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Biden has long clashed with his Church’s leadership that abortion represents a violation of natural law that should not be condoned by law, saying such views are “inappropriate in a pluralistic society.”

What basis for governmental law is “appropriate in a pluralistic society” if not natural law?

5 posted on 10/12/2012 1:59:58 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies
What basis for governmental law is “appropriate in a pluralistic society” if not natural law?

"Who can, may."

6 posted on 10/12/2012 4:12:53 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I am relentlessly reasonable. Mrs. Don-o said so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Abortion is part of the dimocrat’s platform. Of course, Biden is not pro-life; he is pro-baby-killing.


7 posted on 10/12/2012 7:49:11 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
What basis for governmental law is “appropriate in a pluralistic society” if not natural law?

"Who can, may."

If by "pluralistic" one means "savage."

8 posted on 10/15/2012 9:00:05 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

I think the call for unlimited abortions at no cost the “consumer” is pretty savage, and that’s what Joe Biden supports.

On a whole host of issues that we foolishly imagined were subject to the Constitution, the Democrat party’s position is, “Stop us if you can.” They do not consider themselves constrained by law or by simple humanity.


9 posted on 10/15/2012 9:04:03 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Will this be on the test?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
I think the call for unlimited abortions at no cost the “consumer” is pretty savage, and that’s what Joe Biden supports.

Taxpayer subsidies for worship of Moloch.

10 posted on 10/15/2012 9:34:01 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

Sounds like an establishment of religion, doesn’t it?


11 posted on 10/15/2012 9:41:07 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Will this be on the test?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
The Rat party platform:


12 posted on 10/15/2012 9:49:00 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson