“Sure he’s a socialist, but more importantly he’s actually a front man for the desires of fundamentalist followers of Islam.”
His attacks on the family/reproduction would indicate more that he represents atheistic Communism; Muslims have no use for his “gay” and abortion agendas.
“His attacks on the family/reproduction would indicate more that he represents atheistic Communism;”
__________________________________________
I agree. I have always considered him a Marxist and atheist, but sympathetic to Muslims.
Both of his possible fathers were radical Marxist, as well as his friends, associates, and his church/pastor.
Other then some youth years in Indonesia, I see only slight Muslim tendencies
Do they hate him? Yes, they sure do.
Do they have a use for him? Yes, they sure do.
1. He sets rules of engagement to endanger our men, and give them the upper hand
2. He removes our ambassador’s defense team
3. He helps them overturn vile but stable leaders causing regional chaos
4. He cuts our military
5. He advances the Islamic cause in the U. S. with his policies
These and other ways, this guy does things they very much have a use for.
I think his sympathy for Muslims is more in line with the general sympathy liberals have for the Palestinians. In any conflict they support whichever side is poorer and browner, whether they’re right or wrong.