To: Vigilanteman
There is a very good autobiography by the MiG pilot, Viktor Belenko, who defected. The Japanese allowed the CIA to take the plane apart, ship it to Wright-Patterson AFB, reassemble it, analyze every component, and then return it to the Soviets, in crates. The assessment of the vacuum-tube technology created a long-running controversy within the intelligence community. Some though it was mainly indicative of the backwardness of Soviet technology, but others believed that it was a clever, low-cost way to get around the performance sensitivity of micro-electronic components to extremes of temperature, altitude, and speed. Think of a similar comparison between an AK-47 and an M-16 rifle.
To: riverdawg
Tube technology is impervious to nuclear impulse.............
38 posted on
10/10/2012 1:46:36 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(Is it just me, or is Hillary! starting to look like Benjamin Franklin?.................)
To: riverdawg
I think that variant of MIG was powered by a rocket engine that had to be changed out fairly regularly because it degraded quickly from the heat it produced. The plane was an interceptor that needed power over other qualities.
48 posted on
10/10/2012 2:40:44 PM PDT by
Brad from Tennessee
(A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson