[Flotsam_Jetsome]

Why do you keep flogging the material of an Obot who got Zotted?

Hmmmmm.

[Tex-Con-Man]

Why would you defend a piece of obvious propaganda?

HMMMMMMMMM!!!!

[little jeremiah]

Even though the article is by a zotted idiot, he has some things correct. If the photos are of “Ann” (where did the “Stanley” go?), some were published in 1958.

It’s patently obvious the photos are not SAD. Even someone as “anti-birther” as LorenC got it right.

[JT Hatter]

Who’s the Obot that got zotted?

Barackryphal is the liar, as far as I can tell. I’ve read his material and it is fraught with slanted, incorrect information and downright misinformation. It is an attack on Joel Gilbert worthy of Chrissy Matthews. Barachryphal is the fraud.

I dont’ agree with everything Joel Gilbert has come up with, but he had done some original investigating and produced a lot of useful new information. I can’t complete the connection between Ann Dunham and the nude photos, but the evidence is compelling to some. He may produce definitive proof at some point. That would not surprise me.

Gilbert is certainly not a liar. Not by any means. But Barachryphal certainly is.

Obots hate Gilbert and any else who exposes the hidden agenda of their socialist hero.

JT