Posted on 10/07/2012 4:45:12 PM PDT by Kukai
Why are people still talking about the birther issue? Congress and the Supreme Court have said they're not looking into it. But this issue clearly still has legs.
According to Adam Berinsky, a professor of political science at MIT, the birther issue never really went away. He's been conducting polls on the birthplace issue, which he compiled in an article called "The Birthers are (Still) Back." To wit, a lot of Americans continue to have doubts about Obama.
For the last four years, Barack Obama has been plagued by rumors that he is not a natural-born citizen of the United States and, as a result, is not eligible to serve as president. These rumors continue to show surprising resilience.
But what Berlinsky did in his polling was what the progressive defenders of the faith have always done: confused the birthplace question with other questions regarding Obama's eligibility to hold office. To many, the issue isn't where he was born. The question is, who is his father? And is Obama a natural born citizen, since his father was not a U.S. citizen?
Barack Hussein Obama has spent about two million dollars to keep the American people from taking a peek at his original long-form birth certificate. Nobody spends that kind of money unless there's something really damning he wants to hide.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I do not know that they were photographed on the same day. If the theory is to be salvaged at all, it would require the John Ray photographs to have been made in 1960, while the other was made in 1958. (We have LorenC's word that he found one of the Gilbert Photographs in 1958. We do not know for sure that this is true. ) Again, if the theory is to be salvaged, it requires two different women in two different years, but both wearing the same shoes and jewelry. (Yeah, it's a stretch.) The only thing making this remotely plausible is the difference in Chin sizes between the presumed 1958 pictures, and the presumed 1960 pictures.
If Frank Davis was making money doing naked photo shoots I don't see why he would stop doing it from year to year, or stop using the same props. Perhaps he just likes those shoes and jewelry, and perhaps the one girl reminded him of the other.
This is, of course, stretching plausibility, and is very unlikely to be true, but it does seem to me that the chins are different from one girl to the other, and the resemblance is questionable.
When you see a hoof-print, you normally think "Horse." But a hoof-print can also be left by a Zebra. I doubt this is a case of a Zebra, but it doesn't hurt to wonder about it until we know for certain that it is a Horse.
Speaking of Horses, Why the long Face?
None of this is establishing that the photos were actually from 1958, but if one of them can be proven to be from 1958, and it can be established that it is indeed the same girl from the John Ray photos, then that pretty much kills it. It would definitely not be Stanley Ann, though the woman has a remarkable resemblance to her.
Give us a hint.Pretty please.
“There is this for all Freepers to consider: Information is coming out of the woodwork about Obama. Bombshell stuff.”
I am now almost convinced it was you who was the anonymous sender and what you are doing is defending yourself.
On the other hand, if you and Gilbert are trying to convince people that zero had two US citizen parents by placing a girl in bed with Frank Marshall Davis on the strength of a tooth and a chin, it's not working on me.
Your last line of defence appears to be trying to find a magazine printed prior to 1960 that shows images of the same model. Good luck with that. Should you find what you are looking for, all you will have found is more images of the same woman, and frankly, I've seen more than enough of them.
None of the four images in the above composite are of Stanley Ann Dunham. The four images are all of the same model. The four images are from the Gilbert video in which he identifies the model as Ann Dunham. Who-ever she might be, it's the same woman FOUR TIMES.
Without major facial surgery, Stanley Ann Dunham just doesn't fit into the picture.
Gilbert still needs to answer how he came by the caption to this image which has the Elks Club at the wrong address. He maintained that Frank Marshall Davis lived on a floor of a four story building occupied by the Elks Club. The Elks Club was in Vineyard Street, it was a two story office block, not a private residence. And Frank moved into 2994 Kalihi Street, a single level Tudor style residence in 1957/58 - so he had no connection to the Elks Club whatso-ever, particularly not in 1952 when the above image was supposedly taken.
Described as a 'raid' it quite evidently is no such thing, it's just a group of people walking beneath a sign for the Elks Club, being led by a sailor with a flashlight. Gilbert is either smoking something or he thinks we are all idiots. The caption is false, and I would like to know how it came into his possession. From the FBI details you have previously posted, it's obvious FMD never lived at the Elks Club address on Vineyard Street.
That’s definitely Stanley Ann Dunham......When or who took the picture, I really don’t care.
I’ve been going through some old posts and comments, can’t recall if I ever showed you the origin of the images when they were first identified (wrongly) as being of SAD.
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Naughty Obama Mamma
It’s amazing what there is on the internet. A geneological researcher has emailed me with three pictures of Obama’s mother in the nude. That would be of trivial interest except for the setting in which the picures were taken. They were clearly taken in a sophisticated mid-century apartment and my correspondent suggests that the apartment details could be used to identify the photographer. He feels that the photographer is the Communist “Frank” whom Obama mentions as his mentor. That Frank was so intimate with Obama’s mother would support the contention that Frank was in fact Obama’s father. Various bloggers have pointed out how similar Obama looks to “Frank” and the coverup of Obama’s birth certificate is certainly very suspicious.
I will not post the pictures here as Google would undoubtedly take down this blog as soon as I did. Instead, I have posted the pictures here and here and here.
I give below part of the email from my correspondent:
By pure serendipity I found a photo of what I believe is Stanley Ann Dunham; two more I found through sheer plod. They are taken before Christmas by the decorations and unopened presents. Also a stereo and records that an expert could confirm as jazz records are in view.There is a distinctive grain to the wood floors. I do research including genealogical and had downloaded everything I could find. Not much. So when I saw the picture, I locked on the the ear lobes, chin, eyebrows. It is she. A nude photo,not distasteful, but posed, I believe, by a mature man who knows what he likes, including jazz and now we know young girls. One could ascertain the location of where the photos were taken.
And the shoes..not indigenous to Hawaii,but maybe not unsual for Helen Canfield Chicago socialite and Marshall’s second wife. The photos are important in the sense that they explain the going to Chicago and the immediate acceptance by the hard left, if his father is Frank Marshall Davis, not just his mentor
And here’s a link to a webpage which shows a number of otherwise unpublished images of the same woman, named Marcy Moore. The entire story was a fraud from the beginning.
http://a.gogousenet.com/set/mukogvqptgqBlufpppkiqqnrxDbfkunxxherjbyexuortpjy/page-1-date-50.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.