Replies

Your problem seems to be that you can only focus on one item at a time. First it was the tooth, now it’s the chin. Soon I expect you will be telling me that Frank Marshall Davis photographed both girls on the same day in the same room and they both wore the same necklace and earrings. You really need to get off your high horse and take the time to STUDY the images.

I do not know that they were photographed on the same day. If the theory is to be salvaged at all, it would require the John Ray photographs to have been made in 1960, while the other was made in 1958. (We have LorenC's word that he found one of the Gilbert Photographs in 1958. We do not know for sure that this is true. ) Again, if the theory is to be salvaged, it requires two different women in two different years, but both wearing the same shoes and jewelry. (Yeah, it's a stretch.) The only thing making this remotely plausible is the difference in Chin sizes between the presumed 1958 pictures, and the presumed 1960 pictures.

If Frank Davis was making money doing naked photo shoots I don't see why he would stop doing it from year to year, or stop using the same props. Perhaps he just likes those shoes and jewelry, and perhaps the one girl reminded him of the other.

This is, of course, stretching plausibility, and is very unlikely to be true, but it does seem to me that the chins are different from one girl to the other, and the resemblance is questionable.

When you see a hoof-print, you normally think "Horse." But a hoof-print can also be left by a Zebra. I doubt this is a case of a Zebra, but it doesn't hurt to wonder about it until we know for certain that it is a Horse.

Speaking of Horses, Why the long Face?

If the theory is to be salvaged at all, it would require the John Ray photographs to have been made in 1960, while the other was made in 1958.

and not likely inside of the home FMD. There are plenty of his children still living. Why not look at some of their family albums? I'm sure that Mark would be willing to share a couple. He seems to be quite open about the subject. There must be plenty of family photographs showing the inside of their home.

Keep in mind, that in 1960, there was a 9 year boy and 4 girls ages, 10, 7, 2 and newborn Jill living in that house. No traces of any children in those photos and Stanley Ann lived with mom and dad.

I doubt if those outfits came from his home either. So how would two different women (that just happened to look similar) just happen to be coming to the same place for a photo shoot wearing the exact same outfits, two years apart?