Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9
Listen professor, you could make the same point about most offensive language. The point is not whether you find a word offensive. Or even whether you agree with others who find such language offensive.

Forgive me if I detect a whiff of condescension in your response.

My point was simply making a distinction between words that are "offensive" -- but appropriate (if accurate) -- as opposed to words that are "nasty" -- and inappropriate (even if accurate).

"Slut" belongs to the former category.

Please accept my apologies if I have offended you with my response.

33 posted on 10/06/2012 3:00:21 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: okie01
My point was simply making a distinction between words that are "offensive" -- but appropriate (if accurate) -- as opposed to words that are "nasty" -- and inappropriate (even if accurate).

If that's the point you were trying to make, you are on the wrong website. In politics, the only thing that ever matters is public perception, and "inappropriate" is a big part of that.

34 posted on 10/06/2012 3:03:50 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson