Posted on 10/04/2012 9:00:31 AM PDT by nhwingut
bump
As expected, Rush is ON FIIIIIIIYAAAAAAA!!!
The scum in the MSM have voluntarily humiliated themselves for the last 50 years, this is just the latest example of exposing their blatent and demented devotion to the Demonic Party and its minions.
This is the interpretation of what Obama said:
Ya’0h, there isn't anything to say about Saul Alinsky and my attempts to destroy America as his agent, Ya’Oh.
The Oba man should be frog marched to the nearest prison for electoral fraud, no matter how many citizens voted for him in 2008. Sheriff Arapio of Arizona has Obama’s number.
In the war of ideas Mitt was for conservatism, freedom, the private sector, for capitalism. Obama was for marxism/socialism/satism/tyranny.
Romney said he would privatize medicare
2. that private sector works better than government
3. won't raise taxes
4. will repeal Obamacare, that federal government has no right to do this,
5 reduce government regulations on businesses
6. repeal dod frank
7. is for federalism and limiting the federal government , letting states be the labs
all very conservative positions.
Yet many here say there is no difference betweem Marxist POS Obama and Romney
In the war of ideas Mitt was for conservatism, freedom, the private sector, for capitalism. Obama was for marxism/socialism/satism/tyranny.
Romney said he would privatize medicare
2. that private sector works better than government
3. won't raise taxes
4. will repeal Obamacare, that federal government has no right to do this,
5 reduce government regulations on businesses
6. repeal dod frank
7. is for federalism and limiting the federal government , letting states be the labs
all very conservative positions.
Yet many here say there is no difference between Marxist POS Obama and Romney
Wrote this in another thread as well...
Romney won the debate both on facts/data/content and style/presentation. His victory was so dominant and overwhelming that even the media and Obamas campaign cant deny it. So what will Obama do? He will attempt to convince people that Romney won the debate only due to style/presentation. They will hit this hard for the next month in the hope that when people reflect on this debate as they decide to who to vote for, they will forget that not only did Romney destroy Obama on presentation but he also killed him on substance. Obama just had a bad night.
How can Romney combat this tactic? Pick out the most damning segments of the debate where Romney killed Obama on data/substance and turn them into ads that play over and over again in Ohio and Florida.
Check out HillBuzz. Kevin DuJan has an interesting perspective.
You didn't hear? Al Gore says it was the altitude. So it must be true.
They are no doubt scrabbling.
It must have been a tramatic experience for the media.
They had to leave their man/child god (small “g”) on stage by himself without any help from his teleprompter.
Not to mention the media was unable to communicate via 0bama’s blackberry in order to coordinate their answers in advance.
Even worse his answer was refuted by a grown up who doesn’t worship everything he says and does.
Oh my!
Here is something I rarely say but I can hardly wait until the next debate.
The media are just democrats/marxists who took a job as reporters so that they would be in a position to control what people think is happening . They took jobs as reporters so they could turn the U.S.A into a socialist 3rd world hell hole, mainly by getting democrats elected, and also controlling what people are talking about and calling for.
“We The People” are simply is saying “enough is enough” in regards to the “old MSM.”
Yes, so true and its not like Obummer is going to have anything new for the second debate. He has no record to point to. He may look a little sharper next time but will have nothing new to say.
I’m getting dizzy this morning from all the O campaign surrogates trying to spin on Fox this a.m.
If I ran a campaign involving the national media, I would *presume* they are coming after me with both barrels. In fact, if I ran against a popular Democrat, I’d attack the media as much as I’d attack the Democrat.
I would make a pre-emptive strike at a panel debate and inform the audience that the panel are merely Democrat cheerleaders and to weigh carefully the fairness and balance of their questions.
That would steam the media to no end but the truth is that most people hate/distrust the media so this tack would actually be popular as it sometimes was for Newt Gingrich.
Do these media midgets who are so committed to this “redistributionist-in-chief” and his merry band of planners not realize that when his “plan” is fully implemented, they and their posterity will lose the Constitution’s protections along with everyone else?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.