Posted on 10/01/2012 5:35:29 AM PDT by SJackson
Another question is who should be blamed for the fact that our Ambassador was in Benghazi, Lybia, on a very significant date, unprotected.
Hillary Clinton front and center. She’s gotten away with too much in life by virtue of the fact that she’s the smartest woman in the world who doesn’t need notes. Note to Hillary: You’re fired! Take Eric Holder and Susan Rice with you......and if Condi Rice and Colin Powell say you are doing an admirable job, let them join you wherever has beens go. Obama will arrive shortly.
Then the MSM flak chuckers will have a source to "report" the story 24/7.
The “buck” stops with the chief executive in the White House.
I have yet to hear that the present inhabitant has accepted even ONE such “buck.”
There’s not enough water in Washington, D. C. To flush all the stinking human waste that is this administration down the toilet. But I’d sure like to be there with a plunger on Hillary’s head.
Anyone voting as a Rat.
Obama, Clinton, Susan Rice, liberal media, progressives.......
Political jellyfishs in GOP......Who don’t have guts to challenge Obama government on Benghazi scandal.
It’s true that the whole regime is to blame, but Obama is certainly first and foremost among them (followed by Hillary, who may have known better once upon a time but is now a complete Obama suck-up). Aside from the fact that he couldn’t be bothered to attend intelligence briefings, and that he has done everything possible to handicap our intelligence gathering capabilities in the first place, his irresponsible behavior while the thing was still going on and immediately thereafter is so appalling it’s almost unbelievable, even for him.
However, that said, I found it odd that they would put Susan Rice out there in the first place. The UN is not something to which we have to explain our actions nor is it something that has any authority over us or right to have any input in our decisions. So why was our UN Ambassador acting as the lead in all this?
Probably because Obama’s real goal (well, one of them) is to put the US under the control of the UN or some other international body, one way or the other.
And then there’s the other possibility, which was that they feared that at some point it might not be possible to “contain” this anymore (doing the Nixonian “limited modified hang-out”) and she was picked to be the sacrificial victim they would offer up.
Another question is: What was the Ambassador doing in Benghazi on 9/11? What was the purpose of his visit? I have heard two different stories from the administration. What is the truth?
“He ain’t so smart.”
Whomever told an American Ambassador who was also gay and a muslim to assist the terrorists who wanted to take out Ghadaffi and then told the same ambassador to retrieve the same weapons when they discovered that they had given the weapons to other terrorists is responsible.
Blame goes to whoever decided to put an Embassy in a war zone with Seals in it.
And before their dead bodies cooled “the one” was in Las Vegas raising money and telling lies the night of the 12th.
They are already blaming congress because they cut security funding to our embassy’s.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.