Skip to comments.
The Times recommends Barack Obama for president, again (Obama's a failure but we endorse him anyway)
The Seattle Times ^
| September 29, 2012
| Seattle Times Editorial Board
Posted on 09/29/2012 10:12:13 PM PDT by Junior_G
In 2008, Barack Obama was The Seattle Times choice for president. Four years later, we endorse him again, with less enthusiasm. But he is a better choice than Mitt Romney, and could still go down in history as a good president...
(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012; democrats; dncmedia; elections; enemedia; liberalmedia; mediabias; obamedia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Pathetic editorial from a city where the golden rule is vote Democrat, no matter what.
1
posted on
09/29/2012 10:12:20 PM PDT
by
Junior_G
To: Junior_G
A few more endorsements like that and President Obama’s campaign will be on a suicide watch. That was awful!
To: Junior_G
we endorse him again, with less enthusiasmBut aren't they excited about getting a free Obamaphone?
To: Junior_G
A healthy capitalistic society would strip the degenerate influence the Leftwing media has on a liberated America.
Let’s get healthy.
4
posted on
09/29/2012 10:21:26 PM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
To: Junior_G
The Seattle
Times doesn't seem to be excited about a second Obama term.
"A disappointment so far, but he still has promise..." is the best they can do?
5
posted on
09/29/2012 10:23:08 PM PDT
by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
To: Junior_G
Oh wow, their boy beat them up and stole their money, but they still love him. Battered Editor Syndrome.
To: Junior_G
Well then. That settles it.
7
posted on
09/29/2012 10:29:34 PM PDT
by
garjog
(We do not want another four more years of the last four years.)
To: Junior_G
Can’t risk losing any more subscribers.
8
posted on
09/29/2012 10:31:24 PM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong!)
To: Junior_G
So basically they are saying that Obama sucks but Communism is just too good to pass up, hey maybe he will do better next time right Seattle Times?
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
I love this: "...and could still go down in history as a good president."
After one full term, they don't even think he can be considered a good president yet but they still endorse him.
10
posted on
09/29/2012 10:36:35 PM PDT
by
Junior_G
(Funny how liberals' love affair with Muslims began on 9/11)
To: Baynative
11
posted on
09/29/2012 10:38:31 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
(I'm with Sarah Palin and Ted Cruz: "ABO"/Ryan 2012)
To: Junior_G; Nachum
12
posted on
09/29/2012 10:43:17 PM PDT
by
Jet Jaguar
(The pundits have forgotten the 2010 elections.)
To: Junior_G
If there is an institution in the US that is more despicable than the liberal media, I can’t think of it.
This is a conservative site and we all oppose liberalism, but any person looking at Obama objectively has to rule him a failure on the empirical evidence and even according to his own promises he made when he ran the first time.
13
posted on
09/29/2012 10:45:41 PM PDT
by
radpolis
(Liberals: You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy)
To: Junior_G
What other President would have ever gotten an endorsement like that? No one! Basically he sucks, but the other guy MIGHT suck worse so vote vote for our guy. Yes, our guy because the msm realizes if you don't vote for the black leftist, you're racist. Their white liberal guilt tells them this is true and colors every story they write, so to speak.
To: Junior_G; All
... could still go down in history as a good president WOW! There's a ringing endorsement! In other words he s*cks!
15
posted on
09/29/2012 10:51:59 PM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(Osama's dead... and so is our ambassador - Coulter.)
To: Jet Jaguar
16
posted on
09/29/2012 10:54:58 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(The List was hacked- www.nachumlist.com)
To: Junior_G
From the article:
In 2008, Obama promised to use the Federal Communications Commission to block the consolidation of the news media into a handful of giant corporations that threaten the functioning of our democracy. He has not done it. Romney is not going to do it but Obama still could.
So they endorsed him because he made a promise that he did not keep. Just brilliant.
17
posted on
09/29/2012 10:55:00 PM PDT
by
NJRighty
(AB0)
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Boy I’ll say! The Seattle Slimes could have just “Re-Elect Obama?’’ “We don’t think so but we doubt it’’.
18
posted on
09/29/2012 11:13:26 PM PDT
by
jmacusa
(Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
To: Junior_G
19
posted on
09/29/2012 11:21:53 PM PDT
by
Mortrey
(Impeach President Soros)
To: Junior_G
"...After one full term, they don't even think he can be considered a good president yet but they still endorse him. ..."GAD, that's funny! ....................................... FRegards
20
posted on
09/29/2012 11:25:44 PM PDT
by
gonzo
( Buy more ammo, dammit! You should already have the firearms ... FRegards)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson