Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: entropy12

Wrong. Only when initial possession is simultaneous. Defense clearly had possession first. This means that the offense attempting a grab once on the ground is of no consequence. Clearly an interception.


30 posted on 09/24/2012 9:25:42 PM PDT by SparkyBass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: SparkyBass
Wrong. Only when initial possession is simultaneous. Defense clearly had possession first. This means that the offense attempting a grab once on the ground is of no consequence. Clearly an interception

Exactly. That's also what the former NFL official (for 27 years) told the ESPN announcers.

41 posted on 09/24/2012 9:30:01 PM PDT by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: SparkyBass

You are 100% absolutely correct.

These refs threw that game for Seattle.


43 posted on 09/24/2012 9:31:38 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: SparkyBass; All

Initial touching the ball is of no consequence. The play is alive until the player with ball possession hits the ground with his knees. The GB player was still upright when Tate grabbed the ball. When both players hit the ground, both payers still had their hands on the ball. The offense wins the possession.


63 posted on 09/24/2012 9:55:30 PM PDT by entropy12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: SparkyBass

“Wrong. Only when initial possession is simultaneous. Defense clearly had possession first. This means that the offense attempting a grab once on the ground is of no consequence. Clearly an interception.”

You are correct!


69 posted on 09/24/2012 10:00:51 PM PDT by Batman11 (We came for the chicken sandwiches and a Sweet Tea Party broke out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: SparkyBass
First possession must be established though and how can it be established in the air before one hits the ground?

By the time Jennings hit the ground Tate had his hand and arm on the ball too, and he was under Jennings. So I believe it was dual possession which goes to the offense and the call was correct.

Should have maybe been a pass interference call on both the Packer who pushed number 14 and Tate for pushing a defender on the play too.

That call for hitting the QBs legs on the last drive was ridiculous. If they can't hit the QB high or low, what can the defender do?

Packers up 12-7 should have given up an intentional safety. This would have run time off the clock and allowed them to kick off, probably putting the ball further back in field position then they did punting the ball. Bad coaching mistake there.

124 posted on 09/25/2012 2:45:54 AM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson