I don’t disagree.
But is it normal for an Ambassador to travel to a consulate without a security team?
No one has explained why he was there.
Clearly, at least to me, is this trip was a normal part of his routine. And that someone who knew that tipped off the terrorists. They knew he was there. They knew he was without his security.
Why would someone travel without security?
They would if they did not want to draw attention to themselves or if they did not want the security to know what they are doing. Or both.
So, you have a man routinely traveling to a remote site with no security because he did not want to draw attention to himself or he did not want his security team seeing what was going on.
There are very few possibilities for WHY he was there that are not really embarrassing or just plain bad.
One wonders if this is how Obama would protect the United States...with a “no bullet” defense. Pray for the U.S.
Someone in Libya said he was a Muslim.
So you have at least 3 possibilities
A gay tryst (doubtful)
Traitor
CIA
Someone wanted that diary to get out. The question is who. For all we know, it wasn’t even in Stevens handwriting.
The diary sounds like a plant.
If he was a traitor he might write about being a target of the terrorists to give him cover.
If he was following a mission he might write about being a target to give him cover.
This whole thing is bizarre.
It is so bizarre I am wondering if the CIA is out to get Obama voted out.