[AmonAmarth]

That was me, your welcome. I was hoping someone would put this in a vanity. I didn’t want to do it because I wasn’t sure if it was an approved site.

[smoothsailing]

Good post!

I’ve checked this site almost daily lately. I like the approach of using the most recent Rasmussen D/R/I model.

[Puckster]

Oh ye of little faith....bed wetters be silent.

This rocks....nice compilation.

[UnwashedPeasant]

That site is a very clever idea, but I wish they explained the methodology better.

There is a link to an example of unskewing a poll, but it is not clear if that is the same methodology used for all the results. Example: http://www.examiner.com/article/is-the-latest-washington-post-abc-poll-skewed-for-obama

[when the time is right]

There is something I do not understand. If the MSM wants people to go to the polls and support “their” candidate wouldn't it be better to imply in the polls he is close or loosing?

By implying to Conservatives their candidate is loosing by a small number and implying to Liberals that this is an easy walk for Obama won't that inspire Conservatives to get out and vote and Liberals to just say...well Obama is going to win so why go vote?