Something doesn't make sense here...we have heard over and over by the media that MR was out raising BO.
NOW he is at half the funds?
This is either an attempt to dispirit us, or they were lying before....
Am I missing something? Does this explain Romney's slow rollout of ads? Just yesterday the National Review reported the Romney camp was "flush" with cash.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: SoFloFreeper
Romney has plenty of money, don't worry about it. This is propaganda meant to discourage people
2 posted on
09/21/2012 5:47:43 AM PDT by
Perdogg
To: SoFloFreeper
stimulus money diverted to obama’s warchest
3 posted on
09/21/2012 5:49:47 AM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: SoFloFreeper
I knew it. He learned very well. He isn’t a Muslim. He is a deceiver, a thugee a Chicago thugee.
4 posted on
09/21/2012 5:50:22 AM PDT by
longfellow
(Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
To: SoFloFreeper
Even if it’s true, it won’t help Obama this time.
5 posted on
09/21/2012 5:50:49 AM PDT by
ILS21R
(The time is nigh.)
To: SoFloFreeper
“Stimulus” kickbacks for Obama?
6 posted on
09/21/2012 5:52:15 AM PDT by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
To: SoFloFreeper
What about Karl Rove’s Crossroads?
7 posted on
09/21/2012 5:54:17 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
(Romney is still a liberal. Just watch him. (Obama-ney Care ))
To: SoFloFreeper
What more can Obama say? We can see the smoking crater disaster all around us!
9 posted on
09/21/2012 5:54:25 AM PDT by
Obadiah
(The Hunger Games -- Obama's vision for America)
To: SoFloFreeper
I read another article somewhere that the GOP has taken a huge slice of Romney's money for congressional races whereas Obama has largely kept his funds for himself, thus the advantage Obama has in on-hand funds despite Romney's recent fundraising advantage.
To: SoFloFreeper
These numbers are probably accurate. What they don't take into account is the super-pac money. And in that I think Romney has a huge edge. Here:
When national political parties and allied super-political action committees are included, however, Romney entered September with more cash to spend on his side than Obama, $165 million to $101 million.
LINK
To: SoFloFreeper
Notice the wording? Cash on hand.....I understand that candidates must report what they raise but I don't believe they supply the FEC with a balance sheet of what they have to spend on a month to month basis. I'm guessing (JMHO) that this is misleading because it's just recent fund raising totals that include the Beyonce and JZ thug fest and NOT what the candidates actually have to spend. Don't forget the SuperPACs will kick into high gear shortly, as well.
14 posted on
09/21/2012 5:58:10 AM PDT by
liberalh8ter
(If Barack has a memory like a steel trap, why can't he remember what the Constitution says?)
To: SoFloFreeper
Lot of discussion about this on Twitter, and it raised a lot of eyebrows among our more knowledgeable conservatives. We’ve seen the huge funding numbers, and this doesn’t line up. No doubt Obama has money, but the surprise was Romney now having money on hand.
My only theory is maybe they have made a lot of the media buys already for October and didn’t include those in their total. Other than that, is would be baffling considering we kept hearing about all the money they would have after the convention.
15 posted on
09/21/2012 5:59:54 AM PDT by
ilgipper
To: SoFloFreeper
Between Romney and sons they have about 300 million dollars personal wealth.
Is there any good reason that they can’t spend 95% of it on their campaign? I can’t think of any.
Spend it Mitt.
16 posted on
09/21/2012 6:01:24 AM PDT by
soycd
To: SoFloFreeper
I agree, what’s going on?
First obama is broke, Romney has more money than God.
Now obama has more money than Gad and Romney has debit.
The reporting agencies keep public access to the money the campaigns have, so it’s easy enough to verify, would think news outlets would verify before printing (Ok just typing that made me giggle)
17 posted on
09/21/2012 6:01:27 AM PDT by
svcw
(If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
To: SoFloFreeper
To: SoFloFreeper
Need to check out sales of gift cards...
19 posted on
09/21/2012 6:01:46 AM PDT by
Little Ray
(AGAINST Obama in the General.)
To: SoFloFreeper
So let me get this straight... Romney had about $50 million more that Obama going into September, but Obama outspent him, per some reports by a factor of 3 in the battleground states... and now Romney TRAILS in cash on hand? I’m not getting this at all.
21 posted on
09/21/2012 6:02:47 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(Record high turnout is our hope for sending 0bama home. Pray hard!!!)
To: SoFloFreeper
Simple.
- Money stashed away from the first “stimulus”
- Foreign money
- Other corrupt projects like Solyndra
His plan, all along, to stay in power has been to stash money and divert money so he could collect it for his second campaign. He started doing this the day he was sworn in.
22 posted on
09/21/2012 6:04:05 AM PDT by
ryan71
To: SoFloFreeper
Propaganda, pure and simple.
A good part of Romney's fundraising was done jointly with the RNC. Last night, Priebus said the RNC has $77 million on hand; the DNC has $7 million on hand.
Money is not the problem.
23 posted on
09/21/2012 6:20:59 AM PDT by
TonyInOhio
(No representation without respiration!)
To: SoFloFreeper
The RNC and SuperPac money dwarfs what the DNC et al have on the side.
All it means is that Obama has sucked up all the money that would be used to support candidates down ticket.
25 posted on
09/21/2012 6:32:27 AM PDT by
rwilson99
(Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
To: SoFloFreeper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson