Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ARG Ohio Poll: 0 48%, R 47% (sample of 42% Dims, 32% GOP)
ARG ^

Posted on 09/15/2012 9:17:57 AM PDT by Arthurio

Ohio

Interview dates: September 10-12, 2012

Sample size: 600 likely voters

Margin of error: ± 4 percentage points, 95% of the time

Question wording and responses:

If the general election were being held today between Barack Obama for president and Joe Biden for vice president, the Democrats, and Mitt Romney for president and Paul Ryan for vice president, the Republicans, for whom would you vote - Obama and Biden or Romney and Ryan (names rotated), or someone else?

Ohio   Obama Romney Other Undecided Likely voters 48% 47% 1% 4%

Democrats (42%) 90% 7% - 3%

Republicans (32%) 2% 95% - 3%

Independents (26%) 37% 53% 5% 5%

Men (49%) 43% 51% 2% 4% Women (51%) 53% 43% 1% 3% 18 to 49 (53%) 50% 44% 1% 5% 50 and older (47%) 46% 51% 2% 2% White (84%) 42% 54% 1% 3% African American (12%) 90% 3% - 7%  

(Excerpt) Read more at americanresearchgroup.com ...


TOPICS: US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 2012polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Arthurio

Another poll 10% more Dems survey.

These guys must really not want to get contracts next year.

And Democrat DU’ers trolling FR today, you ought to be the ones “worried” if it takes that many more Dems to get you a ones point advantage.


21 posted on 09/15/2012 9:34:26 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio; LS; MNJohnnie; xzins; TonyInOhio

Romney up by 16 among Indies; Romney will take Ohio


22 posted on 09/15/2012 9:35:12 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio
Keep this sheet handy when reading the swing state polls...If they are not sampling close to this then it's bogus.


23 posted on 09/15/2012 9:35:50 AM PDT by nhwingut (Sarah Palin 12... No One Else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio
This Ohioan is about tapped out to conservative (Josh Mandel) candidates. Maybe next payday, somethings in the works but for now-no mas, baby, no mas. If any of you guys can help out http://joshmandel.com/contribute2/?creative=
24 posted on 09/15/2012 9:40:08 AM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71
if you pre-selected the people to interview you could weight the sample. This situation is different. The people were sampled randomly and they self identified what their party preference/affiliation was.

That's not weighting.

For the most part Ohio has almost always had more self-identified Democrats than Republicans since FDR.

25 posted on 09/15/2012 9:51:12 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

mark


26 posted on 09/15/2012 9:52:33 AM PDT by eureka! (Bless Our Troops. D*mn the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
Why?

The answer is they don't. There are more folks in the US who self identify as Democrats than there are those who self identify as Republicans. That's why a random sample will almost always find more Democrats than Republicans.

27 posted on 09/15/2012 9:53:11 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Please explain for us how you do a random sample and then apply a 2008 turnout model ~


28 posted on 09/15/2012 9:54:36 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

I just received a tweet from Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted. One county in Ohio is already over 10,000 absentee ballot requests and it is only September 15th.


29 posted on 09/15/2012 9:56:39 AM PDT by jokemoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Many pollsters weight their samples based on party, age, sex, race, etc. others do not. If a pollster is obtaining samples that are not representative of the population at large, the results become questionable. Some argue that since party affiliation is not set in stone (like race or sex is), it should not be weighted


30 posted on 09/15/2012 10:07:41 AM PDT by Arthurio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Anybody remember where Kasich was relative to Strickland at this point in 2010? My recollection is that Strickland was leading...

This poll is really good news. The Romney Super Pacs need to expand the field to MI and then PA, move the needle, and then force Obama to react.

Obama doesn’t have the $$$ to keep up — DRAIN HIM DRY NOW.


31 posted on 09/15/2012 10:14:08 AM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

“ARG Ohio Poll: 0 48%, R 47%”

Looking better for Romney there than in past weeks, but still looks to be a VERY tough climb for him to win. Doable, but difficult.

48-47% leaves 5% “undecided”. Perhaps a small percentage of the undecideds will vote for other candidates, or not vote at all. So let’s figure that about 4.5-4.8% of the undecideds will contribute to the final tally.

Romney needs 3+% to slip over Obama. Can he get it?
He will need the undecideds to break roughly 2-to-1 in his direction.

Then again, perhaps the events in the Middle East, coupled with a good performance in the debates by Romney, will help him along.


32 posted on 09/15/2012 10:14:31 AM PDT by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio
Alas, what is the methodology ~ can you describe it in detail. If you do a random sample of 1000 and you get an expected number of self-identifications, as long as you don't have a long list of sample cells (age, weight, sexual preference, handicapped, blind, etc.) ~ if it was random, and you've controlled for all externalities so that you got as random a sample as you can get, then you are not weighting anything.

The more detailed samplings that give you a normal distribution of characteristics of the population in general usually involve THOUSANDS of samples ~ else you'll have sample cells out there that don't have enough responses to fit within the expected confidence interval.

We really should always expect a national sample to report back more Democrats than Republicans.

33 posted on 09/15/2012 10:18:54 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jokemoke

Which county and is Husted a Republican?


34 posted on 09/15/2012 10:20:03 AM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut; All
I plugged in you 1.3% advantage to Dems, left everything the same and multiplied out the percentages. Now granted that leaves some 8.7% unaccounted for, and you would have a 47% Romney vs. a 31.2% Obama victory. Tell me where my math is wrong...

That is a blowout folks.....

35 posted on 09/15/2012 10:24:08 AM PDT by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

“There are more folks in the US who self identify as Democrats than there are those who self identify as Republicans”

***************FALSE***************


36 posted on 09/15/2012 10:24:15 AM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jokemoke

What do you mean? Is this good or bad for R&R? Right now I’m so skeptical of anything crossing the wires. Especially polls !


37 posted on 09/15/2012 10:24:38 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: taildragger; All

Correction one to many zeros before the decimal, that is 47% Romney to 40.2% Obama, Still a blowout IMHO...


38 posted on 09/15/2012 10:28:36 AM PDT by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

Here is the “2012 Polling Algorithm”:

Pick the winner (Obama of course)
Pick the margin (a minimum of +1)
Run the poll and get the results
Adjust the D/R/I model to get the desired results
Publish the poll
LOL while watching the media celebrate Obama’s anticipated victory


39 posted on 09/15/2012 10:29:42 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

Otherwise they wouldnt like the results


40 posted on 09/15/2012 10:36:59 AM PDT by italianquaker ( 17 percent of the tea partiers support barry obama, the fox poll said so lol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson