An adoption birth document is a fake (but not a fraud) document. It is a legal fake. And as pointed out the state would not or should not have an issue printing and stamping and embossing additional real copies of such.
Here, Hawaii has a) indicated it holds records, b) indicated what those records have a data in some fashion. But it has never, ever stood up to the actual images of COLB or the LFBC. The 2008 COLB is fake (and fraud) and of course the LFBC is a terrible fake and fraud.
Hawaii may have given the adminsitration an actual document. And they certainly provided a cover letter. ‘Cover’ may have multiple meanings. The political ‘cover’ is enormous. But if Hawaii KNOWS - which they must - that the document originally associated with the cover letter published by the WH has been altered then they are guilty of fraud. Maybe their lawyers have said you can play this game as long as you do not validate the image/digital file posted by the WH as the document sent/given with the cover letter.
A direct question to Hawaii should be this:
“Is the image posted by the Obama administration and referenced in your April 2011 letter to Mr. Obama’s lawyers an exact copy of the document you provided Mr. Obama’s lawyers? If so, please present a certified copy (with embossed/deembossed stamp) and all certifying signatures from the state of Hawaii of this document? “
Hawaii has tip-toed along the line since 2008 on this subject. The April 2011 cover letter is a specific crossing of the line.
Actually Ken Bennett basically asked them to verify that when he requested that they verify that the WH BC was a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file”. And Onaka wouldn’t verify that, even though he was required to do so if he could.
So we have our answer. The question is what anybody is willing to do about it. Which is why Klayman’s letter is so critical: all the state AG’s, SOS’s, dem party chairs, DNC Executive Committee, Committee on Presidential Debates, and Bob Bauer and Nancy Pelosi have all been put on legal notice that this is the case - AND that Onaka similarly confirmed that the HI BC for Obama is not legally valid. They all know this now. The question is whether any SOS will obey the law and refuse to allow a known-fraudulent Certification of Nomination to get Obama on the state ballots, and/or investigate and prosecute the DNC for perjury and election fraud.
The whole thing is on display for us all to watch just like it’s Saturday Night Live. We know these players all know there are crimes being committed and we’re watching to see whether they will do the right thing, or join in on the crimes themselves.
“Smile - you’re on candid camera!”