Posted on 09/10/2012 8:55:44 AM PDT by scottjewell
During a press conference for his latest film, Killing Them Softly, Pitt said:
“I am an Obama supporter and I’m backing his election campaign… Gay marriage is inevitable. The next generation, they get it. It is just a matter of time before it becomes a reality.”
(Excerpt) Read more at inquisitr.com ...
Logically, yes - they are inevitable as well.
Thanks for that-— actually sickening when you think about it. Of course he can be concerned with frivolous things like “gay marriage”. Yes, we need to pray and to revive.
Right. Rich and spoiled and concerned with frivolous things like “gay marriage”.
So what I’m seeing here is that Brad Pitt felt the need to throw his mother under the bus.
We all know Brad’s view on homosexual marriage. Is he a politician running for office? Did he really need to say anything except:
“My mother is entitled to her opinion which differs from mine.”
Now it’s like he had to step all over his mother and overshadow her. Makes him look like the jerk he is.
Apparently Pitt isn’t concerned that the economy might be an issue for “gays” either. Maybe he will take them all in and house and feed them. Assuming any of his wealth is worth the paper its printed on.
Yes, he has revealed himself to be a jerk for certain.
I’ve been hearing for years that Pitt is a switch-hitter. This little homo-loving creep is a disgrace to humanity.
With the gay casting couch in Hollywood, it’s pretty safe to assume these days that any actor plays for the other team.
Just make “Gay Divorce” damned near impossible without both side losing their shirts... Financially speaking that is...
Problem solved...
I had not thought of that. That pepped me up a bit. Thanks ;o)
okay, so shouldn't theis be our standard reply:
"Okay so you are in favor of an additional 1.5% increase in your social security deduction to cover the spouse retirement and disability?"
Arizona 2006, amendment failed by 1% or so. Two years later it was succesfully passed. Cali passed prop 8 by 52% in 2008.
It wasn’t even an issue 30 years ago anywhere, for liberal or conservative states. Hawaii is fairly liberal. It passed its amendment by 69% in ‘98. North Carolina is fairly conservative. It passed it’s amendment by 61% in 2012 and was hailed as some sort of great victory. Look at when the states around NC passed their amendments and what they passed by, you find that they passed them in 2004 or 2006. With the one exeption of Va, not one passed theirs lower than the mid 70% ranges.
Freegards
This is like the “settled science” man-made global warming band wagon.
It’s a big lie that Americans want radicals and perverts redefining marriage and family.
It's the legislatures and judiciaries that have been passing these things (NY was up in arms a few months ago because the legislature passed it contrary to the referendum).
The referendums (straight people's vote) has never yet passed one.
Gov. Linda Lingle (HI) and Gov. Chris Christie (NJ) both vetoed their amendments because the people had decided they didn't want it.
And the reason it is today is that an activist sliver of a minority (2%) is EXTREMELY politically active and trying to outsmart the populace.
This is NOT a grassroots issue. The people generally either are apathetic about it or don't want it.
“The referendums (straight people’s vote) has never yet passed one.”
It failed to pass in Arizona the first time. And your point is a good one, it is much easier for homosexualists to use judge-fiat. But my point is they won’t need judges if the majority accepts ‘gay marriage,’ and the trend isn’t as positive as most seem to think by the popular vote.
Freegards
You're talking about in the legislature, right?
The average the amendments passed by was 67% or so. Many passed by much more, some passed by much slimmer margins. In my opinion, if you would have told someone 30 years ago that only 67% of the voting public would think ‘gay marriage’ was impossible, they would have thought you were wacked.
Freegards
Is that a value judgement?
Well Brad, I hear Alec Baldwin is looking for a partner and if that doesn’t work out Barney Frank is not averse to homopolygamy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.