Skip to comments.
Owners Lose Possessions After Home Near Twentynine Palms Is Mistakenly Foreclosed
CBS-LA.com ^
| 5 Sep 2012
| Stef Riter
Posted on 09/07/2012 7:25:00 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy
The owners of a modest home near Twentynine Palms lost their cherished possessions after a bank mistakenly foreclosed their residence.
A crew broke into Alvin and Pat Tjosaas desert home and took everything after being directed by Wells Fargo to secure the structure.
The couple, however, didnt have a mortgage on the home.
Alvin said the deputy sheriff said, Good news, we know who took (your possessions)
Wells Fargo. Bad news, your stuff is all gone.
All the married couple has now are three generations of memories.
Alvin, a retired mason, built the home with his father when he was a teenager.
I know every inch, every rock
my mom mixed all the cement by hand, he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at losangeles.cbslocal.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: Yashcheritsiy
This is the sort of situation where it would be nice to have a good friend to help you out...
21
posted on
09/07/2012 7:55:19 AM PDT
by
Bobalu
(It is not obama we are fighting, it is the media.)
To: Yashcheritsiy
Wells Fargo is evil! I will never do business with them again under any circumstances.
22
posted on
09/07/2012 7:55:43 AM PDT
by
sauropod
(Only two of God's creatures can employ the term "we": newspaper editors and men with tapeworms-Hayes)
To: duffee
Probably autioned off at a storage facility.
23
posted on
09/07/2012 7:56:58 AM PDT
by
Wiser now
(Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
To: Bobalu
He is one of my favorites in Breaking Bad.
24
posted on
09/07/2012 7:57:51 AM PDT
by
LauraJean
(sometimes I win sometimes I donate to the equine benevolent society)
To: Yashcheritsiy
Seems like a vacation home. I am sure Outstanding Leader will tell these folks that a vacation is necessary, therefore the representatives of the state (bankers) were justified to break and enter and then vandalize.
To: LauraJean
He is one of my favorites in Breaking Bad.
Not anymore.
26
posted on
09/07/2012 7:59:21 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: justlurking
Nope: Criminal matters require intent. It’s pure civil.
27
posted on
09/07/2012 8:00:55 AM PDT
by
ArmstedFragg
(hoaxy dopey changey)
To: Yashcheritsiy
I’ve always considered Bank of America (big donors to Obama and enablers of illegal aliens) to be the worst financial institution in America. Looks like they have serious competition now.
28
posted on
09/07/2012 8:08:49 AM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: ArmstedFragg
Nope: Criminal matters require intent. Its pure civil. As I said, I'd start with that. It would be up to the bank to prove that it wasn't intentional.
Then, we would talk about settling for criminal negligence.
Eventually, we would start talking about money. But by then, they would know that they had better not screw with me again.
29
posted on
09/07/2012 8:10:44 AM PDT
by
justlurking
(The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
To: CORedneck
corrected
Seems like a vacation home. I am sure Outstanding Leader will tell these folks that a vacation home is NOTnecessary, therefore the representatives of the state (bankers) were justified to break and enter and then vandalize it.
To: justlurking
I would have filed burglary, trespass, and vandalism charges against the contractors that stole everything. Doesn't the DA have to charge people for crimes like this. As a citizen I don't think there is anyway you can "file" against someone for burglary. The DA has to take up your cause.
It's not clear that a mistake is really the same thing as a burglery. The contractor was doing a job in good faith. I think intention matters in law.
31
posted on
09/07/2012 8:13:41 AM PDT
by
Jack Black
( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
To: Yashcheritsiy
We were customers of Wachovia Bank. Before the sign on their door even changed to Wells Fargo, we started getting lots of arm-twisting and rude phone calls pushing Wells Fargo products. No matter how many times we told them to stop calling, the intrusions continued. I finally lost my temper with a sales caller, and he shouted back “WE HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO CALL YOU FOR THIRTY DAYS!”
When we cancelled our account, the manager came into the lobby and seemed personally offended, and gave us bloody hell for “... running out on him.”
I am amazed when I see such responses; this shows us how often an ego can push away something we most desire.
32
posted on
09/07/2012 8:21:06 AM PDT
by
InkStone
(ED)
To: Jack Black
You absolutely can make a Citizens Arrest, furthermore the Police are Required to act upon it and either Arrest or issue Citation subsequent to a Citizens Arrest, then the DA will have the case and decide to file or not. The Mere fact that The entire Bunch of THIEVES, including the Banker’s that ordered this CRIME are not in Prison as we speak as well as having their Assets Seized should demonstrate to EVERYONE that The DA is as CORRUPT as the Day is Long, I will also include EVERY Police Officer in the CITY with this for not Arresting EVERYONE INVOLVED. Why anyone puts faith in these Thugs is beyond me. There is a pretty abundant amount of clear and convincing evidence to warrant wholesale arrests and prosecutions in this case, ignorance of the law is neither a defense nor an excuse in the State of California.
33
posted on
09/07/2012 8:22:38 AM PDT
by
eyeamok
To: Jack Black
Doesn't the DA have to charge people for crimes like this. As a citizen I don't think there is anyway you can "file" against someone for burglary. The DA has to take up your cause. Yes, that's correct. I meant a "complaint". It would be up to the DA to file the charges.
It's not clear that a mistake is really the same thing as a burglery. The contractor was doing a job in good faith. I think intention matters in law.
The bank is claiming it was a mistake. Would you take their word for it, at this point?
As I noted to another poster, it would be up to the contractor (and bank) to prove it wasn't intentional. But, I would have made my point.
Then, we would start talking about negligence, and whether it was criminal or gross negligence.
By the time we started talking about damages, their culpability would be well-established.
34
posted on
09/07/2012 8:24:42 AM PDT
by
justlurking
(The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
To: CORedneck
Just think of it as the Obamunist regime’s idea of ‘reverse mortgage’.
35
posted on
09/07/2012 8:30:54 AM PDT
by
Noumenon
(“...the other side wants everything in America to be free, except us.” Paul Ryan)
To: justlurking
I leave the details of abuse to my lawyer. He jokes that you can find him by dialing 1-800-dial-a-bastard.
/johnny
To: ArmstedFragg
You still have the DA file the charges. The key is changing the time element from favoring the bank to favoring the homeowners. The homeowners have their house trashed and unusable, their personal items lost, and they can't start repairs until a settlement is reached. The bank in contrast is sitting on the money from the sale of the stolen items. Their lawyers are on staff and unlike the homeowners who have to pay insane hourly rates or turn over 1/3rd of the value of their possessions to a lawyer tieing it up in court for years costs the bank nothing.
Put the bank manager under arrest and even when he gets out on bail he is going to want to clear his name. His bond will likely mean a nice lean on his home. The case now becomes just as personal for him as it is for the homeowners.
Finally criminal charges reverse the lawyer bill issue. The DA is being paid by the homeowner, in the form of taxes, regardless of if a case is pursued or not. Hence no additional charge to the homeowner. The banker and his contractors will need to hire their own lawyers, as lawyers specializing in criminal cases are usually not on staff at a bank.
The fastest and easiest way for the banker to clear the breaking and entry charge is in to admit in court that they acted with criminal negligence. Making a credible threat of criminal proceedings encourages the bank to write big checks, write them quickly and to do it with the minimal involvement of lawyers.
37
posted on
09/07/2012 8:50:39 AM PDT
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: redgolum
I don't (knock on wood) have a problem with my mortgage, but I keep getting dunned for a bill for some lady with the last same name. AS far as I can determine, this woman has NEVER lived at the house that I own.
I call, I straighten it out. Then, a couple of years later, I get a dun from some other collection agency.
Any FReepers that are lawyers out there? Answer this question. Can I safely ignore these notices” I'm tired of trying to make Indian telephone dun collectors, whom I can barely understand, get the point that they can whistle for their money as far as I am concerned.
38
posted on
09/07/2012 8:54:04 AM PDT
by
chesley
(God's chosen instrument - the trumpet)
To: Yashcheritsiy
"Probably just a buncha deadbeats trying to get a house without paying a mortgage!!! /certain FReepers "LOL!!! True, true.
To: Yashcheritsiy
They should sue for 20 million dollars.
40
posted on
09/07/2012 8:58:57 AM PDT
by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson