Posted on 09/07/2012 2:16:53 AM PDT by SMGFan
Blame Canada?
This was a godless pagan revival meeting.
To them, politics are their religion. They hate the Almighty, and they love themselves and sin.
Why are liberals this way? Easy. They want to be free from God's law - so that they can do what they want to do. Much of that motivation is driven by sexual sin.
Look at what Aldous Huxley admitted to when asked by he was an atheist:
"I had motive for not wanting the world to have a meaning; consequently assumed that it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption. The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in pure metaphysics, he is also concerned to prove that there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do, or why his friends should not seize political power and govern in the way that they find most advantageous to themselves. For myself, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation, sexual and political."
Aldous Huxley
For entertainment value, her speech was easily the best moment of the convention. And it doesn’t hurt that she is damn good looking woman.
She’s had a lot of work, including surgery to remove an unattractive facial mole.
Granholm failed in her early career ambition to become an actress, so after a stint as a Hollywood tour guide (”Ask for Babs”), she entered law school. I suspect many attorneys are failed actors.
Her “LOOK AT ME” antics did not win her many admirers. She came across as a nut job.
And she’s considered a star in the dem party.
Who let the dogs out???
This woman has gone off the deep end. History will show that Ford received NO stimulus money, and has still managed to create the hottest ‘pony car’, and outsell ‘Government Motors’ Camaro every month.
All those deluded women holding Ford signs, makes me wonder where THEIR head might be located.
I don’t believe in virtual meaninglessness because I think there is value in everything with or without our perceptions of reality.
Huxley seems to have been satisfied with low-level qualities of meaning whereas somebody like...uhh, Rush Limbaugh for example, constantly strives for ever-higher levels of quality.
The higher the quality, the greater the value. However, I think it also depends on how those qualities are gaged or measured...and now the American people have seen how liberals like Pelosi, Granholm, Reid and Obama measure success!
Can you dig it?
Can you dig it?
Caaaaan you diiiig iiiiit?
Yeah man, like...that’s why her old man asked her to not use his name.
Yeah man, like...that’s why her old man told her to not use his name.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.