First, please cite where I said, “Blacks will riot and pillage when their benefits stop.”
Cite it, or shut your pie hole.
Second, can you cite an example of millions of people in a city quietly starving to death, without going out to find food “by whatever means necessary?”
Your use of “RACIST!” as your catch-all critique is worn out and no longer effective. You need to argue from facts and ideas, not just scream “RACIST!” when you are out of constructive ideas.
marker...
That is the entire thesis of you article, premised on that single event. Second, you have posited a red herring. Finding food is always preferable to destroying the source of food. Third, it is vital to understand the nature of racism. It is the expression of false categorical imperatives such as that the termination of benefits will cause the gimme generation to riot in the streets. As I have made clear this is the basic racist argument of the left. Sadly some apocolyptics perpetuate these slanders. No doubt there will be some inconvenience. However, there will be an immediate and substantial response from the private sector to alleviate suffering and deprivation. If you can not consider this most basic human response to catastrophe your thesis does not stand the test of human decency. As to the "shut your pie hole" and "out of ideas" nastiness I leave those to dear reader to decipher.