That is the entire thesis of you article, premised on that single event. Second, you have posited a red herring. Finding food is always preferable to destroying the source of food. Third, it is vital to understand the nature of racism. It is the expression of false categorical imperatives such as that the termination of benefits will cause the gimme generation to riot in the streets. As I have made clear this is the basic racist argument of the left. Sadly some apocolyptics perpetuate these slanders. No doubt there will be some inconvenience. However, there will be an immediate and substantial response from the private sector to alleviate suffering and deprivation. If you can not consider this most basic human response to catastrophe your thesis does not stand the test of human decency. As to the "shut your pie hole" and "out of ideas" nastiness I leave those to dear reader to decipher.
That is the entire thesis of you article, premised on that single event.
Then you should have no trouble copying and pasting where I actually SAID that.
Back up your charges of racism in my essay, with direct quotes, or if you cannot, you are admitting here that you are a damn liar.
So you're going to describe the "nature" of racism by restating your position?
Grow up. "You don't understand" is the last redoubt of the petulant teen that can't secure agreement from adults.
Honestly, I'm beginning to think you are nothing but a SPLC sleeper provocateur. I find it hard to believe you could have such a command of terminology while being of such sophomoric sensibilites.
Perhaps the mods should review your history.
“your thesis does not stand the test of human decency.”
Yours doesn’t stand the test of history.