[E. Pluribus Unum]

A bunker-buster might not be able to take out their nuclear-enrichment facilities, but a nuke could.

And, thanks to ZerØ, it has come to that.

[ROCKLOBSTER]

A bunker-buster might not be able to take out their nuclear-enrichment facilities, but a nuke could.

Well there must be such a thing as a bunker-buster-nuke. If not, they could probably fab one up real quick.

Holy Earthquake Batman!

[B212]

I would think a standard bunker buster, could cause the underground factories to be buried, to such an extent, that it would take years to recover from the damage....

[Pox]

No need to take them out, simply collapse the entrances and exits and repeat when necessary.If they can’t get in or out their facilities are basically useless.

I say this under the premise that any attack will likely start a war which will eventually require troops on the ground and if/when it comes to that, the ground troops can take care of the facilities.

[Mr Apple]

Unum correctly states:
A bunker-buster might not be able to take out their nuclear-enrichment facilities, but a nuke could.

E. Pluribus Unum, Jewbacca; GOP J, and KC Lion, I'd like to have your thoughts on my posts #27 and #29 from the article below if you have a moment please:

"John Bolton Confirms: Israel Is Alone"

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2926110/posts?page=24