Posted on 08/31/2012 7:40:34 AM PDT by Hojczyk
Democrats have feared for years that one of the particular challenges of running campaigns in 2012 would be simply locating their voters. The party’s constituencies (young people, immigrants, minorities) tend to be among the most mobile demographic groups. And as NPR speculated this week in an analysis of battleground-state foreclosure figures, the housing crisis will likely only have made things more difficult for Democrats looking for their supporters.
But the voter file represented a fiction, or at least a reality that had rapidly become out of date. During those eight weeks, canvassers were able to successfully find and interact with only 31 percent of their targets. Twice that number were confirmed to no longer live at the address on file — either because a structure was abandoned or condemned, or if a current resident reported that the targeted voter no longer lived there.
Last month the Milwaukee County District Attorney’s office subpoenaed the national office of the Service Employee International Union (SEIU) in Washington D.C. for the employment documents of a senior organizer currently under investigation for vote fraud in Wisconsin.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Like fake IDs aren’t easy to get?
Many drive up from Illinois (I mean “are driven up”) from Illinois.
Milwaukee’s lost voters might have existed - maybe years ago. Maybe they were people who signed up for a 'free' 3 days and 2 nights stay at a Florida Time Share or random names from a phone book... maybe some of them lived in Milwaukee and signed up to vote decades ago.
Who knows?
What we know is they're not real people living in Milwaukee today - or maybe ever...
When democrats commit voter fraud they vote the people who don't show up to vote. They take those cards - ballots - whatever and MARK them up for democrats. Voting the dead is an unintentional byproduct of voter fraud. Voting those who don't show up is where the big numbers are - the dead only a small percentage... (In fact, the dead vote it's a nice way for us to know where cheating is going on...)
I suspect Milwaukee wheeler dealers have heard those who cheat the vote this time are going to jail... and they're covering their asses.
As far as NPR is concerned?? NPR is understanding of liberal elite excuses - even 'tolerant'... but before giving them too much credit, it's important to understand they benefit from voter fraud. It's poor inner city black cheating that props up white liberal elite power. Without the poor black vote ( much of it NOT real) white liberal elites would be out of power. NPR needs to wake up to who they've become.
But somehow their vote for Obama will still be counted...
Milwaukee’s lost voters might have existed - maybe years ago. Maybe they were people who signed up for a 'free' 3 days and 2 nights stay at a Florida Time Share or random names from a phone book... maybe some of them lived in Milwaukee and signed up to vote decades ago.
Who knows?
What we know is they're not real people living in Milwaukee today - or maybe ever...
When democrats commit voter fraud they vote the people who don't show up to vote. They take those cards - ballots - whatever and MARK them up for democrats. Voting the dead is an unintentional byproduct of voter fraud. Voting those who don't show up is where the big numbers are - the dead only a small percentage... (In fact, the dead vote it's a nice way for us to know where cheating is going on...)
I suspect Milwaukee wheeler dealers have heard those who cheat the vote this time are going to jail... and they're covering their asses.
As far as NPR is concerned?? NPR is understanding of liberal elite excuses - even 'tolerant'... but before giving them too much credit, it's important to understand they benefit from voter fraud. It's poor inner city black cheating that props up white liberal elite power. Without the poor black vote ( much of it NOT real) white liberal elites would be out of power. NPR and PBS need to wake up to what they've become.
Some have moved...some...but I would bet this was a huge scam...shows you why the ID is a good idea...and probably mail in ballots should go too..
Which means that the Constitutional abuse and fiscal profligacy we suffer as a consequence of Federal, state and local mismanagement from these fraudulent candidates NEED NOT OCCUR
if We the People become vocal and vigilant in our communities.
My Dad told me, “Whenever there’s big money involved, someone’s going to find a way to cheat.” There are trillions of dollars in the public treasuries. The Democrats know that it’s easier, safer and more profitable to loot the public treasury than rob banks or grocery stores. The Democrats aren’t misguided idealogues, they’re just dirty little thieves. And they get cover from the old media who keep saying, “We didn’t kill those people or steal that money, it was those other Democrats who killed those people and stole that money! We just covered for them for a share of the loot.”
I do hope the “commercial data vendor” got top dollar out of them.
Yep, in the ‘80s I rented a 1br apartment in Boston. When I went to vote, mine was one of eight names on the list for my address.
>>There really has to be a way to clamp down on double voting in two states.<<
I’ll toss in an idea of mine to see how people in here react to it.
We already have a national registry of citizens and legal non-citizens. It’s called Social Security. (The one thing I don’t know is if SS tags a non-citizen SS# as being non-citizen, but I would guess that they do.)
So, it would be relatively easy to have a national requirement that the Social Security database be made available to any state that wants to use it in the voting process. Only one thing would have to be added to the database, and it wouldn’t even have to be archived for more than a short time (like gun registrations are handled.) That one thing would be a short-term voting record for each SS#. It would be a simple yes or no for each election date, cancelled out a month after the date of the election.
Each state could then decide whether to access that database to confirm whether a voter:
1) Was a citizen of the U.S. and therefore entitled to vote.
2) Resided in the state, and the voting precinct, in which he was attempting to vote.
3) Was old enough to legally vote.
4) Was still alive to cast a vote.
These four simple checks would remove nearly all doubt that the person in question was eligible to vote in that polling place, and only in that polling place. Combining that with a photo ID law would prevent people from voting in the place of habitual non-voters as well. The photo ID could even have a tag on it prohibiting a person from voting if he was a felon or was not a U.S. citizen.
And finally, revert to a system where absentee balloting is not encouraged, but rather is discouraged instead (as it used to be due to the danger of fraudulent voting.)
With the spread of computers and wireless access, smart phones, etc., the above would be trivial to implement.
Obviously the title of the article is sarcastic, so I can't help but feeling a sense of Schadenfreude at the Democrats' problems in this regard.
Democrats in government at all levels tend to calculate, formulate and enact policy with their chances in the next election foremost in mind.
But in this instance, their housing and economic policies seem to have boomeranged on them, creating this situation where they are having big-time problems locating their voters. The law of unintended consequences!
You can bet that Milwaukee isn't the only big city where this is happening.
Sorry, the above post is a little confusing. As I wrote it I realized the archiving at SS wouldn’t really be needed. Just having access to the correct SS address on file for each individual voting would ensure that they only voted in one precinct.
If someone wants to vote where they go to school, or spend half the year in the South, they would need to change their permanent SS address to do so.
how about that
Clarifying further, a voter would supply his Social Security # upon entering the polling place and requesting a ballot. For those concerned about privacy, it could be set up to have the voter punch in his SS# and have it blocked out (like passwords currently are) and then the screen would fill with the relevant data, citizen, name, age, current address, and no date of death thus far. (The SS# wouldn’t have to appear on the screen.)
Combine that with a photo ID with name and current address, and you’d be good to go.
Then go to work on the absentee ballot fraud, probably by insisting upon personal visits to the county clerk’s office to vote absentee and by once again requiring specific reasons to qualify for an absentee ballot.
“canvassers were able to successfully find and interact with only 31 percent of their targets.”
But won’t we all be surprised when 115% of them cast ballots?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.