Any evidence that FMD ever lived here?
The sign on the building:
| WAIKIKI LODGE NO. 1304 IBPOE-W |
Improved Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks - Waikiki
Address: 1316 N. Vineyard St. (located over 3 miles south of 2994 Kalihi St.)
Posted on 08/31/2012 12:18:19 AM PDT by Kukai
Why has the President spent millions to suppress his ID and who is he really?
As President Barack Obama completes four years in office and runs for re-election in November, a majority of Americans – 55% – believe he was born in the United States. However, 20% of Americans do not believe Obama was born in the US, while another 25% aren’t sure where he was born. Never before have so many Americans doubted the fundamental basis of their president’s identity. Why is this so?
On one level, the answer is easy given the absence of verifiable bona fides attesting to Obama’s life story, from every college record to every travel document, from every medical record to every legal writing to every law practice billing record to every record of his tenure as an Illinois state senator – and more. But the story has had to penetrate the American psyche in spite of a deep freeze on the topic in conventional channels. The Obama identity story, burning at the grass-roots-level for more than four years now, is consistently snuffed out and ignored by American journalists and the political class, from elected leaders to party officials. This silence is strictly non-partisan, and spans the political spectrum.
An investigation, undertaken by a so-called cold case posse working for Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Maricopa County, Arizona, has now concluded that not one but two Obama basic identity documents are, without a doubt, forgeries: 1) the computer file (pdf) of the 1961 birth certificate that appears on the White House website; and 2) the president’s 1980 military draft registration card released by the U.S. Selective Service Administration shortly before the 2008 election. These investigators maintain they can prove this in court.
The story of how they might do so is verboten, too. But somehow the saga doesn’t end up in George Orwell’s “memory hole”. This is due mainly to the irrepressible nature of the Internet.
It is here, for example, and not in the mainstream media, where, following the White House online release of Obama’s 1961 ”long-form” birth certificate on April 27, 2011, a small army of private individuals with varying degrees of technology expertise downloaded the document file and delved into the unexpectedly “unflattened” graphic composition “layers”. They submitted a series of computer forensics analyses to this online public square, arguing that the White House pdf had been fraudulently manipulated. Since that time, similar evidence has been methodically amassed and repeatedly tested under the auspices of Sheriff Arpaio’s cold case team.
Sheriff Arpaio formed this cold case posse after 250 local citizens asked him to determine whether Obama was eligible to appear on the Arizona presidential ballot in 2012.
On two occasions in 2012, the posse presented findings to the public. They concluded that the birth certificate on the White House website didn’t originate on a piece of paper but rather was created, or, more precisely, forged as an electronic file on a computer. As one Adobe expert and posse consultant put it: “The only time Obama’s long-form birth certificate image exists as a paper document is when a computer user selects Print from the File menu.”
At this point, the posse would like to turn over all of its evidence to Congress for a formal investigation. Like a hand grenade that could go off at any moment, however, such an investigation has no takers. And so the fuse burns on not one, but two potential constitutional crises.
One involves the biggest unsolved mystery in American history: If Arpaio’s findings are correct, who did it? The other potential crisis, while linked to the first, is much more transparent. The U.S. Constitution lays out three criteria for president and vice president. Article II, Section 1, requires that the president be at least 35 years of age, have lived 14 years in the United States, and be a “natural-born” citizen.
“Natural born” citizens are distinct from citizens who are native-born (born in the country) or naturalized. While native-born or naturalized citizen may hold any other office, only “natural born” citizens are eligible for the presidency, the idea being that America’s founders wanted to ensure that the chief executive had allegiance only to the American republic.
The Constitution doesn’t define “natural born”, but according to common law at the time and, later, the 1875 U.S. Supreme Court case “Minor v. Happersett”, a “natural born” citizen is understood to be someone born in the U.S. to citizen parents (plural). “Minor” spelled out this definition and is thus the signal case. It is remarkable that in mid-2008, as Barack Obama was clinching the presidential nomination, references to the “Minor” case inexplicably disappeared from 25 related U.S. Supreme Court decisions archived at Justia.com, a leading legal search engine popular with journalists and legal bloggers. Coincidence? When attorney and blogger Leo Donofrio, whose Obama eligibility challenge went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in December 2008 (dismissed), discovered this apparent tampering in 2011, Justia called it a “programming error”. The blogosphere called it “Justiagate”. The media, of course, said nothing at all.
So where does this leave the president, the son of a white American teen mother and a black British subject from Kenya? (Kenya became independent in 1963.)
According to his own story, Baby Obama came into the world with dual American-British citizenship. At the same time, however, there is, to date, zero verifiable evidence to be found of his Hawaiian birth; meanwhile there is circumstantial evidence of alternative nativities. For example, the personal biography Obama’s former literary agent used to promote Obama described him as “born in Kenya”. This biography, written in 1991, remained on the agency website until April 2007 – two months after then-Senator Obama announced his presidential run.
Other oddities include a missing week of immigration cards tracking American arrivals into Hawaii from abroad that should be in the national archives. Obama’s birthday in August 1961 falls in this missing week. In light of unexplained facts such as these, in light of the Obama documents that remain sealed, it’s really not so hard to see where a foreign nativity story comes from – or at least why a number of Americans are confused.
Many have heard about the two 1961 newspapers that published announcements of Obama’s birth. Posse investigators discovered that foreign-born children were similarly announced as Hawaiian births in these same papers, while they also found a set of adopted twins who were several years old before their “birth” announcements appeared.
Further complicating Obama’s citizenship story is an undisputed school record from Jakarta which identifies young Obama as a citizen of Indonesia. With all of this in mind, it’s hard to stamp Obama “natural-born”. Still, no challenger to date has managed to convince an American court of this. Of course, almost every single case has been dismissed before trial.
Also worth noting is that almost every single case sought the same thing: the release of the Obama birth “long-form” birth certificate. This is the very document the White House website put on display in April 2011. Obama spent an estimated one to three million dollars to fight previous attempts to compel him to release this same document. What happened to make the president change his mind?
Two senior White House officials presided over the birth certificate’s unveiling at a pen-and-paper, off-camera, no audio-recording, press conference. One journalist in the pack pointed out, “some people are going to remain unconvinced”. He continued: “They’re going to say that this is just a photocopy of a piece of paper. You could have typed anything in there. Will the actual birth certificate be on display or viewable at any …”
The White House transcript breaks off with the word: “(laughter)”.
Who will get the last laugh? Barack Obama? Sheriff Arpaio? The politicians who keep their heads down, or the citizens who take their Constitution seriously? Whoever laughs last, it seems safe to say that the Obama birth certificate is a very funny document.
| WAIKIKI LODGE NO. 1304 IBPOE-W |
SAD raised Obama for a time, but the biological mother, she was not. Anne Dunham’s ,( another wife of Obama Sr.’s), trail with Obama Sr. has confused people into thinking SAD was Obama’s mom. There were two separate Afro children Anne Dunham took care of for a time, BHO and another as infants. There is really no real evidence which independently of forged documents verifies SAD as Obama’s biological Mother.
Its one reason we have not seen the original birth certificate of BHO. SAD is not the Mom.
Unfortunately no Court has been willing to decide the issue.
As in times past, it has become the task of the People to enforce the Constitution.Maybe we will luck out and that will be accomplished via ballot box, BUT I have my doubts about that, as I am sure you do.
The Tree of Liberty was not planted with any election manure.Its growth required something much more grave.
Ping
Neither you nor any other FReeper has provided even a single document to support this claim, and you have no evidence of forgery for any of the numerous cross-corroborating documents establishing SADO as Barry's mom.
If you have such documentary evidence please post it in the Mal-Val thread and ping me rather then hijacking other threads with vaporous speculations.
Thanks
If you have such documentary evidence please post it in the Mal-Val thread and ping me rather then hijacking other threads with vaporous speculations.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Just a might tetchy aren’t we? LOL.
The truth hurts? WHY?
Just look over a few old photos and you will see the documentary evidence you need. Its already been posted on the thread you have referenced.
Why do you think the courts (and legislatures) bottom to top will not enforce the Constitution in this matter?? I have been putting the question to my mind and thoughts for many months. The only cause that keeps in play is that there is something very, very big time and clandestine in operation. If so my guess is is that this something has roots that go back in years unrealized. The essential question/action is how to get at the root of this phenomena absent 50% of the people and public media.
Whatever Kincaid et al now choose to go along with, I think we deserve an explanation for that caption - which obviously DOES NOT belong with the image.
DISCLAIMER: While this excellent article deserves to be widely read, I also want to make it clear that I am definitely not convinced by the thesis that Frank Marshall Davis was Barack Obama’s biological father. Trevor Loudon
I got convinced of the SAD-not-the-mother and the other Ann, and the two dark babies, on the “Auntie” thread. All the evidence a rational perons needs, and more has been contributed since then, as you note.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2702976/posts
Yes, I agree with your conclusion , as you know. Cripes, one would think that some posters here on FR,have vested interests in their own pet theory.Talk about raw nerves. Idjits?
The fact is that we know nothing about Obama, and the field is strewn with false evidence to mislead just about anyone, while the decisive evidence has been purged by counter intelligence operatives. The USA has been scammed by usurpers IMHO, with the MSM in aid.
We likely have no idea at this point who Obama’s Mom really is. I also tend to WANT to think that Stanley Dunham is the father and that these commies raised some of their illegitimate offspring in a communal way, as was popular back in those days with Western commies ( The Commune Movement).But I have no evidence of any of it except what my take is on resemblance beteen SD and Obama.
Ear patterns are usually inherited, and so maybe we could look for comparisons on that from photos. LOL.
Nope, we just do not know anything about Obama’s background really. Thats the sad fact. All the defining evidence has been hidden or purged.That in itself should be enough to have the FBI dedicated to finding out. You can bet that foreign intel organizations DO know the truth, such as Mossad, Canadas Secret Service , etc.
Agreed - and without the complicity of the MSM, none of this would have been able to occur. I would disagree that no one knows the truth (i mean among "peons", national security people of various countries I am sure know a lot). The research done by some freepers, much or at least some of which has been posted on various threads over time, gives very strong indications of parentage and other background, such as what really happened in Indonesia.
The bloom is off the rose, or perhaps more to the point, the shine is off the excrement, and "chickens are coming home to roost". 0kaka cannot IMHO win another term. They can't fill up auditoriums or stadiums, and they can only do so much voter fraud.
You’re a traitor to your country.
Riiiiight.
I’m not the one making wild, baseless accusations about the President’s background. If you expect us to take seriously anything you say, you might want to consider actually posting ONE SINGLE LITTLE SHRED OF PROOF.
Like your parents, I have no expectations of you and certainly wouldn’t look to you for affirmation.
You’re a disappointment and your blaming everyone, but yourself. Stop projecting and get a life.
In your post, “your blaming,” should have been, “you’re blaming.” Before you run along to much-needed grammar lessons, would you kindly post a citation for your Catholic charity adoption nonsense? Kthxbye.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.