Until recently, the word from Hawaii was that Fukino confirmed in an extra-legal press release that she saw the original vital records “verifying” that Obama was born in Hawaii. The legal presumption was that her announcement was not fraudulent and that she was not engaging in misprision of fraud and forgery.
Now Alvin Onaka has come out with the real deal: a legal document confirming that the record Fukino was talking about is legally non-valid.
Onaka’s legal document has been published, and the legal presumption NOW has to be that Onaka’s LEGAL response/document is in compliance with the law - and that he failed to verify any of Obama’s birth facts requested on Bennett’s actual verification application for the only reason allowable by law: because he cannot certify that the birth really happened that way.
IOW, until recently the legal eagles had to presume that Fukino was telling the truth and not deceiving everybody. Now Onaka has revealed that her statement was deceptive, because the record Hawaii has is LEGALLY NON-VALID. Bennett asked for the truth, as allowable by law, and Onaka told him the truth: Obama has no legally-valid birth record, and what he has presented is a forgery to hide the non-validity of the record.
With that out in the public, every lawyer in the country legally has to presume that Obama has NOT qualified as eligible. We can’t even know how old he is. With the cat out of the bag DIRECTLY FROM ONAKA IN A LEGAL DOCUMENT, any lawyer that allows Obama to proceed as if he was eligible is committing visible felonies in full view of everybody. There is nowhere they can legally hide any more.
This changes everything.
BTW, I have run my evidence past 3 lawyers and they all agree that the evidence and reasoning are legally sound.
And the actions of the Mississippi Democratic Executive Committee reflect that they also recognized what Onaka had disclosed - because when MDEC requested a verification they made sure to not ask for any birth facts to be verified. They knew from the Bennett verification that Onaka could not and thus would not verify anything if they asked him to verify that the birth actually happened in the way Obama has claimed.
In fact, their request was what first clued me in that my reasoning IS legally sound. And then I checked it with some lawyers, who all agreed.
When you’ve got even the MDEC lawyers acting in agreement with the interpretation that 3 other lawyers have also confirmed as legally-sound, that is an admission against interest - one of the highest forms of evidence that exists.
America ? you didn’t birth THAT.