WRONG. You have no idea what you are talking about.
Maybe you can enlighten me with some facts rather than hysterical hyperbole why any voter after voting for either Akins, Brunner or Steelman would all of a sudden vote for someone they know nothing about.
In other words, show me that you know what YOU are talking about and answer the question as to WHY they would vote for yet a 4th unknown candidate after having their vote taken away from them. HINT: Just calling them morons isn't the answer.
If the shoe fits Garybob. Maybe you are different but I'm confident that the vast majority of GOP voters care about the future and the Senate majority and wouldn't be so stuck in the past that they'd be butt hurt (OR CARE AT ALL) if Akin were replaced by someone other than one of the 2 people he beat, neither of whom are ideal. Your suggestion they may then not vote in the election out of some kind of spite is absurd on it's face.
Since the dumb SOB appears to be staying in the race I don't see the need to debate this nonsense with you.