Okay, then you’re on the record of thinking it’s okay if Akin costs us the majority in the Senate, and plays into the Democrats game plan of framing the Republicans as people who don’t grasp women’s issues.
It’s okay if Missouri sends a Democrat to the Senate, and it’s grand if a guy who should be kicked through the uprights from over fifty yards, instead continues on with GOP support.
We lament the fact the Democrats keep a guy like Byrd around, and then put our full support behind a guy who has demonstrated he is mentally deficient on gender issues.
Not with my help...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2921696/posts
Are you boycotting Rush Limbaugh because he played into the hands of Democrats with the "slut" comment? Democrats will play whatever hand they want anytime they want. We conservatives are so much better on the issues that we don't need to be afraid of them. And I will never change my principles and policies on moral beliefs just to get votes.
And I believe voters will come back to Akin, assuming he doesn't have his resources cut off. I believe the voters of Missouri are decent people who don't want to crucify a guy for passing on some information that may have been incorrect, or used an incorrect word for something.
I never called for Democrats to boot anyone out of their party. I think it should be up to the voters whether they keep a guy like Byrd, Rangall, or Wiener. Their offenses are minor compared to what all of the Democrats vote for every day anyway, so I'm not going to feign outrage over them when I'm always more outraged than that already over liberal policies.