I see.......so what you’re basically arguing is that an ALREADY pregnant woman being raped could be more likely to result in a miscarriage?
That’s....really interesting...and totally irrelevant to what the adults are discussing, please try and work on your reading comprehension.
That’s....really interesting...and totally irrelevant to what the adults are discussing, please try and work on your reading comprehension.
Oh, I have no problems with reading comprehension.
And, yes, I'm sure you do consider it irrelevant now.
And if adults weren't discussing biological factors why were you so vociferous in your denials in your previous replies?
Where has the "discussion" moved to now?
He can't win anyway? He'll get no money from here on out? He should still drop out?
I see.......so what you’re basically arguing is that an ALREADY pregnant woman being raped could be more likely to result in a miscarriage?...
...his problem is that he inserted a clause in between his subject and predicate, which obfuscated what he wanted to say...what you’ve posted above is simply trying to backpedal because you misread his original statement...
...trouble is, what Akin said doesn’t in the least resemble his premise...assuming his premise to be the least bit defensible, which I do not...