“The President’s “view” on abortion have no EFFECT on the number of abortions.”
Okay.
“However, Obama’s views on infanticide and his support of NOW and Planned Parenthood...” (You love those ellipsis points don't you!)
Huh?!? You just said it doesn’t matter what the President believes about abortion, since there is no correlation.
Let's post what you selectively omitted!
The President's "view" on abortion have no EFFECT on the number of abortions.
However, Obama's views on infanticide and his support of NOW and Planned Parenthood pretty much guarantee that public funding will find its way from my pocket into abortions via Obamacare.
Let's review:
1. Romney's verbal opposition to abortion doesn't reduce the number of abortions, in fact, it appears to be a negative correlation.
2. Obama's support of NOW and Planned Parenthood and votes to LEGALIZE infanticide -DO- make it more likely that ALL OF US will have to pay for some portion of abortions under Obamacare.
“Let’s post what you selectively omitted!”
Yes, what did I “omit”? An apples to orange comparison, which contributes nothing to the discussion. That’s why I omitted it, because it’s nothing more than a distraction.
If Romney’s views have no correlation with the number of abortions, then Obama’s views have no correlation either. That is the apples to apples comparison. Throwing in the junk about Obama supporting PP and funding for abortions is an entirely different argument. If you want to muddy the waters with that, fine, but I don’t have to take the bait.