“Let’s post what you selectively omitted!”
Yes, what did I “omit”? An apples to orange comparison, which contributes nothing to the discussion. That’s why I omitted it, because it’s nothing more than a distraction.
If Romney’s views have no correlation with the number of abortions, then Obama’s views have no correlation either. That is the apples to apples comparison. Throwing in the junk about Obama supporting PP and funding for abortions is an entirely different argument. If you want to muddy the waters with that, fine, but I don’t have to take the bait.
Oh. You need arguments expressed more simply.
Let’s see.
The President’s opinions on Apples have no effect on the total number of apples in the US.
But also...
Obama likes apples, and he also thinks I should help pay to buy apples for his constituents.
Oh goody. Now it’s all apples and you can comprehend the point.
Babies are being murdered, and anything you do to get Obama reelected won’t affect the number of murders much, but it may set us all up to pay for some of the murder.