Skip to comments.
New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed
NBC News ^
| 8/11/12
| Natasha Khan, Corbin Carson
Posted on 08/12/2012 5:49:47 AM PDT by Libloather
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: Libloather
Who cares what this manipulated study says? You need an id to do most commercial transactions in this country. You should have an id for one the most important civic responsibilities you can exercise. If people are too stupid or unable to legally obtain an id, they shouldn’t be voting anyway.
21
posted on
08/12/2012 6:20:07 AM PDT
by
3Fingas
(Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
To: Libloather
"New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed" Meanwhile, in Mexico...
"In order to vote, all Mexican citizens must have registered before the election and have obtained a voters ID that includes ones photograph, name, address, fingerprint and age." - Link to PDF document
22
posted on
08/12/2012 6:22:18 AM PDT
by
Flag_This
(Real presidents don't bow.)
To: Libloather
How can you have a case of ID fraud if you do not check ID?
23
posted on
08/12/2012 6:23:58 AM PDT
by
Erik Latranyi
(When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
To: Libloather
24
posted on
08/12/2012 6:38:12 AM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: Libloather
If there is "no evidence" photo ID is required for voting, then why does
anybody have to show an ID when cashing a check, buying liquor or cigarettes, signing a mortgage, getting a traffic stop, entering a secure area, or a host of other reasons people are asked for it every day in the normal course of business?
What's so special about voting that it is singularly excluded? Shouldn't we just take everybody at their word they are honest and are who and what they say they are??
Of course we know the answer. It makes f-r-a-u-d easier for those stealing elections!
25
posted on
08/12/2012 6:38:23 AM PDT
by
Gritty
(This election represents the last exit ramp before the death spiral - Mark Steyn)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Partisan Media Shills ping.
Thanks Libloather.
26
posted on
08/12/2012 6:38:26 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Libloather
Bush vs. Gore/Loserman came down to 537 votes out of 146 million registered voters. That's 0.00037%. Because of advances in marketing technology elections are frequently coming down to 50/50 coin tosses, so yes fraud can have a huge effect.
Democrats aren't the brightest criminals. The cell phone companies already have subscriber location data in their computers. If would be easy to detect if a free Obamaphone traveled to multiple voting places on election day.
27
posted on
08/12/2012 6:40:33 AM PDT
by
Reeses
(Sustainable energy? Let's first have sustainable government.)
To: Libloather
“Minnesota Leads the Nation in Voter Fraud Convictions”
ST. PAUL, Minn., Oct. 13, 2011— Minnesota Majority today released a report on voter fraud convictions to date stemming from Minnesota’s 2008 general election. The report finds that 113 individuals who voted illegally in the 2008 election have been convicted of the crime, “ineligible voter knowingly votes” under Minnesota Statute 201.014.
“As far as we can tell, this is the largest number of voter fraud convictions arising from a single election in the past 75 years,” said Minnesota Majority president Jeff Davis, “Prosecutions are still underway and so there will likely be even more convictions.”
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/minnesota-leads-the-nation-in-voter-fraud-convictions-131782928.html
28
posted on
08/12/2012 6:44:35 AM PDT
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Libloather
29
posted on
08/12/2012 6:45:47 AM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: Libloather
If election officials are not checking for voter fraud, it is pretty difficult to find any case of fraud.
If the police are not checking for drivers who are speeding, it is pretty difficult to find any case of speeding.
Given the lengths to which the Democrats are going to defend their anti-ID stance, it alone indicates massive voter fraud.
To: Libloather
Absolutely amazing that so many people would attempt ID deceptions while buying liquor, cashing checks, and boarding airplanes, but nobody would ever do it while voting. I guess that just shows how much Americans revere our political process. Probably because we have such inspirational leadership.
To: Libloather
Leftist reporters reporting on a leftist study of leftist voter fraud. Gosh, what’s not to trust?
32
posted on
08/12/2012 7:04:55 AM PDT
by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: madprof98
" I guess that just shows how much Americans revere our political process. Probably because we have such inspirational leadership." Yeah, and it's not like there's anything to be gained by stealing an election, so why bother?
33
posted on
08/12/2012 7:09:16 AM PDT
by
Flag_This
(Real presidents don't bow.)
To: Libloather
A new nationwide analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesima It permitted Al Frankenfraud to steal a Senate seat and thus pass Obamacare.
Theft has consequence.
34
posted on
08/12/2012 7:09:47 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Eric Holder's NAACP rally against the voter ID laws required the press to bring govt issue photo ID.)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
How does a database find evidence?They used an analysis program written by Stevie Wonder. /s
35
posted on
08/12/2012 7:17:52 AM PDT
by
ken in texas
(I was taught to respect my elders but it keeps getting harder to find any.)
To: Libloather
Of course, the idiots who created and analyzed the database are and remain clueless that over 1.8 million DEAD people are still registered to vote.....nope, we don’t need no stinking voter ID requirements, none at all. /s =.=
36
posted on
08/12/2012 7:19:28 AM PDT
by
cranked
To: Libloather
DNC
37
posted on
08/12/2012 7:21:50 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Nope 2012)
To: Libloather
Without a voter ID requirement there is no way to see voter fraud happening or prove after the fact, thus there no evidence of it.
A Government that sends 23,000 tax refund checks to a SINGLE home address in Fla isn't going have much luck finding voter fraud with the current system.
Absentee ballots sent in mass to mental hospitals and rest homes might be a good place to start looking though.
38
posted on
08/12/2012 7:21:58 AM PDT
by
Beagle8U
(Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
To: Libloather
Voter fraud at the polls is an insignificant aspect of American elections, said elections expert David Schultz, professor of public policy at Hamline University School of Business in St. Paul, Minn. Does he lend his name too, to 'Global Warming' defense teams as well?
What a crock. . .and offered with a straight face. Liberals are so practiced, of course. . .
39
posted on
08/12/2012 7:23:29 AM PDT
by
cricket
(http://voteron2012.com/)
To: DoughtyOne
DNCropagandists
40
posted on
08/12/2012 7:25:08 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Nope 2012)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson