Posted on 08/09/2012 7:16:04 PM PDT by jazusamo
The job of first lady is purely voluntary. It is no different than agreeing to serve on the board of the local United Way or Red Cross chapter at no pay. No one is forced to accept the role when offered.
If Michelle doesn’t want to play the role of first lady, for no financial compensation, she can quit at any time. She can live in the White House as spouse of the President, she can move back to Chicago and sit at home in her mansion, she can try to go out and find a paying job or volunteer to work unpaid for a nonprofit. Her time is hers to do with as she chooses.
She is a free agent, not a victim. If she stops being first lady today, very few will care. The elimination of her staff and travel budget will benefit the taxpayer.
What a douche. I’ll give her a quarter to never speak again.
And he goes after Romney for being a rich guy.
She had an abortion?
In law, one would say the First Lady Ho has NO CONTRACT WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
American voters did NOT elect her to office! Her husband was elected.
If she wants a career, she could have continued to work in her crony job at $300K/year.
I mean, what’s a real husband for?
OK....Pay her what’s she’s WORTH..........NOTHING!
How do you know she had an abortion?
:Those perks are forms of compensation.”...........
Is she being taxed for those perks? If that were you or I, wwe sure as hell would be visited by the IRS if we failed to list them as “compensation”.
That is an excellent idea.
Obama Campaign Misdirection,dont look at the Elephant in the room the Economy, Dont look at the Fat ass,Look at those Toned Arms
How exactly do they get to be “Bishop”?
I don’t think this was his idea. I think this comes directly from the horse’s mouth....and yes, I mean Michelle.
Before she can be paid, what is she qualified to do?
And don’t put down lawyer, bacause she lose he law license.
I’d chip in a few bucks if it meant she stayed off camera.
With these people, her mug may soon be on your money.
OH thank you so very much for the clarification.
Thanks for the link. FactCheck does, in fact, confirm that their law licenses are inactive (or, in Barack's case, retired), but it goes on to say:
"But the claim that the Obamas “surrendered” their licenses to avoid ethics charges has no basis in fact. Neither of the Obamas has any public record of discipline or pending proceedings against them, according to the online public registration records of the ARDC. We also confirmed that with Grogan, who said that the Obamas were "never the subject of any public disciplinary proceedings."
Which is directly opposed to one some others have said on this thread, that the Obamas gave up their licenses to prevent some sort of charges or ethics complaints from being pursued.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.