Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coleus; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; cindy-true-supporter; ...

So that means Obamao and Mitt-Witt are both out with Catholics then?

Maryland “Freak State” PING!


34 posted on 08/09/2012 9:56:07 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Obama should change his campaign slogan to "Yes, we am!" Sounds as stupid as his administration is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

“So that means Obamao and Mitt-Witt are both out with Catholics then?”

You’ll hear/read conflicting opinions, but in my humble opinion, yes. Supporting any politician who supports abortion, same sex “marriage,” euthenasia, contraception, sterilization is supporting a candidate who supports that which is intrinsically evil. A Catholic cannot do that without committing sin. Some will may say something about the lesser of two evils. And they may have some merit in their arguments. I cannot support willard in anything. By virtue of his own legislation in MA, “Romneycare,” he has supported many of the items I just listed above. Should he win, I truly believe he would make a show of diminishing Obamacare, but nothing more. His focus is not removing the evil patterned upon his own, but being elected President of the United States. There’s an important distinction there which cannot and should not be missed.


38 posted on 08/10/2012 2:39:48 AM PDT by sayuncledave (et Verbum caro factum est (And the Word was made flesh))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson