I challenge anyone here to lay out a good case as to why the President (any president or candidate, not Romney or Obama, necessarily) should get involved in this CFA issue at all.
I am personally in the ‘fight’ against two homosexuals getting married and having the central socialist government edict such a challenge to God!
The CEO merely expressed his views, which are those of a large percentage of intelligent Americans. Those that think this is a good idea are either homosexuals or their drooling, hand-dragging moron sycophants.
It's about representation.
In regards to marriage and the natural family, the CFA head represents most Americans. The normal people, with decent morals. The same morals Americans have always adhered to.
Obama and Romney do not.
But, if a candidate does represent those things, they should say so.
Like I'm doing right now.
It became a national issue the minute those big mouthed Democrat mayors publicly threatened to single out a private company for punishment because its CEO expressed an opinion they disagreed with. All should be treated equally under the law, and being sanctioned by the government for expressing traditional Christian beliefs would be in violation of anti-discrimination and civil rights laws. More importantly, this is a brazen attack on Christians by powerful politicians, and this attack must be denounced and vigorously opposed. We know that the Kenyan, who promised to side with the Muslims if they were attacked, will do nothing to help the Christians. Is it really unreasonable to ask Mittens to speak in favor of free speech and equal protection under the law?