I am personally in the ‘fight’ against two homosexuals getting married and having the central socialist government edict such a challenge to God!
The CEO merely expressed his views, which are those of a large percentage of intelligent Americans. Those that think this is a good idea are either homosexuals or their drooling, hand-dragging moron sycophants.
No argument here, but the fight belongs where you and I are at—not at the Presidency. Unless we’re talking a Constitutional amendment (which we’re not), Romney shouldn’t be talking at all. This was a case of private citizen, privately-owned company, homosexual activists, predictable leftist media, radio show hosts, a couple of idiot mayors, and grassroots consumer support all going at it together. In the end, no Federal laws were broken, the homosexuals and their supporters ended up looking like idiots, and it’s all good.
Romney and/or Obama injecting themselves into the issue is pointless and self-defeating, ESPECIALLY for Romney. If he says he’s against CFA, he burns up what little right-wing credentials he has. If he says he’s for CFA, then the media gets to sharpshoot him from here ‘til November, with Obama and his surrogates more than willing to throw gas on the fire the entire time.
Presidents should stick to presidential issues, and this isn’t one.