Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Finny
Where do you think conservative Republicans would stand in Congress in opposing liberal moves by a very liberal top Republican and top political figure backed by such a sound popular mandate?

One crisis at a time. First, let's get that black communist out of office and THEN we can worry about dealing with Romney's liberal urges. If you push against Romney so hard that Obama wins, what have you gained?

If Romney wins, the economy jumps back to life. Let's celebrate that and THEN we can start keeping Romney in check. If Obama wins, we have four more years of excrement on a shingle, plus a lawless president that won't care how many laws he breaks or how many executive orders he signs to circumvent Congress and now has no re-election to keep his communism in check.

If you think Romney is liberal, you just wait to see what Obama would do in a second term. I can't risk that happening. NO SANE AMERICAN CAN RISK THAT HAPPENING.

So stop doing Obama's bidding which is the only think you can possibly hope to accomplish with your sophistry.

90 posted on 08/06/2012 9:08:38 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Our economy won't heal until one particular black man is unemployed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: OrangeHoof
One crisis at a time.

Wrong. Look at the course you're plotting to avoid lethal shoals altogether, because if you get in them, navigating them "one crisis at a time" with a liberal behind the wheel is guaranteed to have bad results.

You want to get "the black communist" out of office because you are so certain that a Repubican congress, even if Obama only won on a plurlaity (very likely the best he could do, reading the tea leaves), wouldn't have the courage to fight him -- yet you think that same Congress would defy the defacto leader of their own party who won with a solid popular mandate majority?

Wishful thinking, anyone?

Romney sure as heck didn't do much for the economy of Massachusetts. Really, there's so much wishful thinking that must be engaged in anticipating Romney. Obama is a weak fraud -- but you are so terrified of his imaginary power that you refuse point blank to consider means to make him vulnerable and take advantage of it. Instead, you advocate voting to make liberalism more powerful in the Republican party. It is quite, quite that simple: that is what you are proposing to do, and then wishing, wishing, wishing that the liberal you elect will not act like the liberal you KNOW him to be.

Because you cannot handle the REAL risks of Romney winning on a landslide and the REAL sense of at least voting for a plurality to prevent a mandate of either liberal, you are reduced to accusing me of sophistry, ironic because you then accuse me of doing "Obama's bidding." YOU are doing liberalism's bidding. FACE IT. And then face that crisis FIRST.

92 posted on 08/06/2012 9:26:09 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: OrangeHoof

Agreed.


101 posted on 08/06/2012 10:33:21 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson