Posted on 08/06/2012 4:08:23 PM PDT by tsowellfan
Drudge Title: India Blames White House For Shooting
Top State Department officials including Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have been working behind the scenes to assuage Indian anger following the attack on a Sikh temple in Wisconsin over the weekend by an Army veteran and alleged former white supremacist.
Indian government officials and Sikh leaders across India were outraged by the attack that left 6 dead, including 4 Indian nationals, at a Sikh temple near Milwaukee and called on the U.S. to do more to protect Sikhs living in the United Sates. Clinton called Indian Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna from her stop in South Africa Monday after Krishna criticized the U.S. for failed policies and a growing trend of violent incidents against religious minorities...
(Excerpt) Read more at thecable.foreignpolicy.com ...
Btw there is no newsflash.
Secondly....... Sikhs community leaders in US themselves have been complaining for almost a decade now about elevated levels of racial violence against them post 9/11 . They arent quite satisfied with the “random act of violence” BS being peddled.
Firstly you dont know that they are citizens. Most Sikhs I know are not citizens (and I know a lot more Sikhs in US then you ever would).
You opinion on this particular issue is heavily weighed down by your own “hate America” baggage that you carry over from other global issues facing US. India is not inherently America hating country. India is quite pro-America in fact. However it is often arrogance in times like these that fuels the America hating anger overseas. Its much more prudent diplomacy to apologize and let the dust settle. Lest you want another country (which is actually a friendly ally) to have the same attitude towards visiting Americans or expats living in India.
And I highly doubt that the US government (even the one as bad as the current one) would go about determining the citizenship status of the dead victims, relatives or the temple goers before making a call on whether or not to apologize. That would not only be very insulting but that would definitely piss of the Sikh community and India.
When I say “in the case” it doesn’t mean it IS the case.
My comments stand as written. Don’t jump to conclusions. Bye.
Doesn’t matter either ways.
it doesn’t matter who created that term — YOU are the one repeating it. No one else on this thread has said anything about the Sikhs. you, ravager, are insulting them, why?
Read the papers before coming up with stupid comments.
those were American citizens, not Indian citizens.
Read the papers before coming up with stupid comments.
those were American citizens, not Indian citizens.
in fact there is no proof for your statement that they were recent migrants either. Don't jump to stupid conclusions
I use it to refer to my kind. I am allowed to.
Oh yeah you read newspapers, so you know. You make me laugh.
No need to feign that silly umbrage, little boy. You got nothing.
> I use it to refer to my kind. I am allowed to.
Isn’t the term “raghead” used for Arabs and other Muslims?
To American eyes we look like Arabs and Muslims. Eitherways Indian are called ragheads too.
To American eyes we look like Arabs and Muslims. Eitherways Indian are called ragheads too.
To American eyes we look like Arabs and Muslims. Eitherways Indian are called ragheads too.
Okay, some Indians appear as “ragheads” to some Americans but many Americans try to insult Indians by calling them that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.