Replies

I am only drawing the obvious conclusions from DO’s posts.

DO specifically expressed that he prefers Obama to be reelected and that Bush nearly destroyed the country.

DO: “At this point the earliest chance we have to install a Conservative is January 2017, and we all know that isn’t going to happen unless Romney does lose now.” (post 12)

DO: “it’s best to let Obama take the nation down, “ (post 25)

DO: “But for the grace of God, George Bush didn’t destroy the nation.” (post 38)

I love it when you folks dig yourself into a very deep hole, and just continue to shovel.

Okay, let's play this game.

I am only drawing the obvious conclusions from Innovative’s posts.

DO specifically expressed that he prefers Obama to be reelected...

Innovative has specifically expressed approval that Conservatives got the blame for the Bush meltdown, and are also blamed because Capitalism itself is now in question by our president as a result.

He doesn't have the slightest concern that Conservatism was severely damaged by the Bush team, and thinks that our nation almost going belly up, is not a problem as long as Repbulicans did it, and Conservatives got the blame.

...and that Bush nearly destroyed the country.

Innovative is in denial about the financial crisis Bush handed off. Further it doesn't strike him as a blemish on Conservatism that Bush blew out the existing national dept he took over from Clinton by 93%.

DO: “At this point the earliest chance we have to install a Conservative is January 2017, and we all know that isn’t going to happen unless Romney does lose now.” (post 12)

If Romney is elected in 2012, he will get the nomination in 2016 by default. Thus the only way we can nominate a Conservative in 2016, is if Mitt loses now. I don't make these facts up. I just relate what they are. If folks want to play pretend, they can do that. I just think it would be better if they would do it on 'my silky pony.com'.

DO: “it’s best to let Obama take the nation down, “ (post 25)

If our choices are to allow our team to implement the Democrat agenda for them, as the Bush administration did, then I think it better to allow the Democrats to get the credit for destroying our nation.

I and patriots like myself, believe in our founding principles. If it is seen that supporters of those principles brought this nation down, they will never be credible again.

So no, I don't want Romney implementing policies that will destroy our nation. Let Marxism get the credit. And that only happens if a Marxist is the driving force that takes this nation down. I do not want it done in Conservatism's name, even if it is a Democrat in sheep's clothing like Romney.

I know Innovative would rather see Romney appoint Leftist judges like Bush did, but I'd like to avoid it.

DO: “But for the grace of God, George Bush didn’t destroy the nation.” (post 38)

Evidently Innovative's thoughts on this are, "God, why didn't you let him?" Once again, if an (R) brings the nation down, that's a-okay with some people.

Remember folks, vote Romney this fall so the Democrats don't get blamed for destroying the nation. And remember, it's only another three or four elections until the Tea Party takes over. Be patient.